These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20377966)

  • 1. Effects of experience with swabbing procedures on the numbers of bacteria recovered from carcasses by swabbing with sponges.
    Gill CO; Badoni M
    J Food Prot; 2010 Apr; 73(4):747-51. PubMed ID: 20377966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing with three types of sponge or gauze.
    Martínez B; Celda MF; Anastasio B; García I; López-Mendoza MC
    J Food Prot; 2010 Jan; 73(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20051208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microbiological conditions of sheep carcasses from conventional or inverted dressing processes.
    Gill CO; Bryant J; Brereton DA
    J Food Prot; 2000 Sep; 63(9):1291-4. PubMed ID: 10983809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects on the microbiological condition of product of carcass dressing, cooling, and portioning processes at a poultry packing plant.
    Gill CO; Moza LF; Badoni M; Barbut S
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 110(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 16793158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbiological sampling of poultry carcass portions by excision, rinsing, or swabbing.
    Gill CO; Badoni M; Moza LF; Barbut S; Griffiths MW
    J Food Prot; 2005 Dec; 68(12):2718-20. PubMed ID: 16355849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hygiene indicator microorganisms for selected pathogens on beef, pork, and poultry meats in Belgium.
    Ghafir Y; China B; Dierick K; De Zutter L; Daube G
    J Food Prot; 2008 Jan; 71(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 18236660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microbiological effects of a routine treatment for decontaminating hide-on carcasses at a large beef packing plant.
    Yang X; Badoni M; Tran F; Gill CO
    J Food Prot; 2015 Feb; 78(2):256-63. PubMed ID: 25710139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microbiological sampling of meat cuts and manufacturing beef by excision or swabbing.
    Gill CO; Badoni M; McGinnis JC
    J Food Prot; 2001 Mar; 64(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 11252475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing.
    Gill CO; Jones T
    J Food Prot; 2000 Feb; 63(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 10678419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aerobic Mesophilic, Coliform,
    Jaja IF; Green E; Muchenje V
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29690529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One-year (2003) nationwide pork carcass microbiological baseline data survey in Taiwan.
    Yeh KS; Chen SP; Lin JH
    J Food Prot; 2005 Mar; 68(3):458-61. PubMed ID: 15771166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental comparison of excision and swabbing microbiological sampling methods for carcasses.
    Pepperell R; Reid CA; Solano SN; Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Johnston AM; Buncic S
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2163-8. PubMed ID: 16245724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microbiological baseline study of swine carcasses at Swedish slaughterhouses.
    Lindblad M; Lindmark H; Lambertz ST; Lindqvist R
    J Food Prot; 2007 Aug; 70(8):1790-7. PubMed ID: 17803133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    McEvoy JM; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro system for the comparison of excision and wet-dry swabbing for microbiological sampling of beef carcasses.
    Cenci-Goga BT; Miraglia D; Ranucci D; Branciari R; Budelli L; McCrindle CM; Cioffi A; Mammoli R
    J Food Prot; 2007 Apr; 70(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 17477263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbiological contamination of cattle carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two abattoirs.
    Zweifel C; Capek M; Stephan R
    Meat Sci; 2014 Oct; 98(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 24967539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of swabbing and destructive methods for microbiological pig carcass sampling.
    Ghafir Y; Daube G
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 47(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 19241527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of wet-dry swabbing and excision sampling methods for microbiological testing of bovine, porcine, and ovine carcasses at red meat slaughterhouses.
    Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Avery SM; Reid CA; Wilson D; Howell M; Johnston AM; Buncic S
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2155-62. PubMed ID: 16245723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbiological consequences of skin removal prior to evisceration of broiler carcasses.
    Berrang ME; Buhr RJ; Cason JA; Dickens JA
    Poult Sci; 2002 Jan; 81(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 11885893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.