These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20378452)

  • 1. Estimating the total ultrasound attenuation along the propagation path by applying multiple filters to backscattered echoes from a single spherically focused source.
    Bigelow T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Apr; 57(4):900-7. PubMed ID: 20378452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound attenuation estimation using backscattered echoes from multiple sources.
    Bigelow TA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1367-73. PubMed ID: 18681622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of local attenuation approximations when estimating correlation length from backscattered ultrasound echoes.
    Bigelow TA; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):546-53. PubMed ID: 16875251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved algorithm for estimation of attenuation along propagation path using backscattered echoes from multiple sources.
    Bigelow TA
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Apr; 50(4-5):496-501. PubMed ID: 19913861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the total ultrasound attenuation along the propagation path by using a reference phantom.
    Labyed Y; Bigelow TA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3232-8. PubMed ID: 21110618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the spectral fit algorithm as functions of frequency range and deltakaeff.
    Bigelow TA; O'Brien WD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Nov; 52(11):2003-10. PubMed ID: 16422412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tissue Attenuation Estimation by Mean Frequency Downshift and Bandwidth Limitation.
    Klimonda Z; Postema M; Nowicki A; Litniewski J
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Aug; 63(8):1107-15. PubMed ID: 27254862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimization of the algorithms for estimating the ultrasonic attenuation along the propagation path.
    Labyed Y; Bigelow TA
    Ultrasonics; 2012 Aug; 52(6):720-9. PubMed ID: 22424697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of total attenuation and scatterer size from backscattered ultrasound waveforms.
    Bigelow TA; Oelze ML; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1431-9. PubMed ID: 15807030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scatterer size estimation in pulse-echo ultrasound using focused sources: theoretical approximations and simulation analysis.
    Bigelow TA; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jul; 116(1):578-93. PubMed ID: 15296018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation.
    Rubert N; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1680-96. PubMed ID: 24726800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gaussian wavelet based dynamic filtering (GWDF) method for medical ultrasound systems.
    Wang P; Shen Y; Wang Q
    Ultrasonics; 2007 May; 46(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 17363023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Signal to noise ratio comparisons for ultrasound attenuation slope estimation algorithms.
    Omari EA; Varghese T
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032902. PubMed ID: 24593741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining temperature distribution in tissue in the focal plane of the high (>100 W/cm(2)) intensity focused ultrasound beam using phase shift of ultrasound echoes.
    Karwat P; Kujawska T; Lewin PA; Secomski W; Gambin B; Litniewski J
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():211-9. PubMed ID: 26498063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel coded excitation scheme to improve spatial and contrast resolution of quantitative ultrasound imaging.
    Sanchez JR; Pocci D; Oelze ML
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Oct; 56(10):2111-23. PubMed ID: 19942499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating myocardial attenuation from M-mode ultrasonic backscatter.
    Baldwin SL; Marutyan KR; Yang M; Wallace KD; Holland MR; Miller JG
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 31(4):477-84. PubMed ID: 15831326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A theoretical comparison of attenuation measurement techniques from backscattered ultrasound echoes.
    Labyed Y; Bigelow TA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2316-24. PubMed ID: 21476687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
    Liu W; Zagzebski JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A successive parameter estimation algorithm for chirplet signal decomposition.
    Lu Y; Demirli R; Cardoso G; Saniie J
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2121-31. PubMed ID: 17091847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo ultrasonic attenuation slope estimates for detecting cervical ripening in rats: Preliminary results.
    Bigelow TA; McFarlin BL; O'Brien WD; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1794-800. PubMed ID: 18345867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.