These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20379024)

  • 1. Evaluation of Candida albicans formation on feldspathic porcelain subjected to four surface treatment methods.
    Karayazgan B; Atay A; Saracli MA; Gunay Y
    Dent Mater J; 2010 Mar; 29(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 20379024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Yuzbasioglu E; Bal S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains.
    Sarikaya I; Güler AU
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 20379676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the effect of a home-bleaching agent on the surface characteristics of indirect esthetic restorative materials: part I--roughness.
    Torabi K; Rasaeipour S; Khaledi AA; Vojdani M; Ghodsi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 May; 15(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 25307815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of extraoral porcelain polishing sequences on surface roughness and color of feldspathic porcelain.
    Yuzugullu B; Celik C; Erkut S; Ozcelik TB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):472-5. PubMed ID: 20095196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of grinding, polishing, and overglazing on the flexure strength of a high-leucite feldspathic porcelain.
    Williamson RT; Kovarik RE; Mitchell RJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 8630175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of the surface treatment and saliva on the color of two porcelains.
    Vieira GF; De Caroli A; Amorim JC; Matson E
    Dent Mater J; 2001 Jun; 20(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 11523976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of fluoride and 10% carbamide peroxide on the surface roughness of low-fusing and ultra low-fusing porcelain.
    Butler CJ; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Thompson GA; Runyan DA; Anthony von Fraunhofer J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 15295328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of surface treatments of porcelain on adhesion of Candida albicans.
    Lawaf S; Azizi A; Farzad A; Adimi P
    Gen Dent; 2016; 64(4):e1-4. PubMed ID: 27367639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the finishing technique on surface roughness of dental porcelains with different microstructures.
    Sasahara RM; Ribeiro Fda C; Cesar PF; Yoshimura HN
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 17024946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of simulated mastication on the surface roughness of three ceramic systems.
    Amer R; Kürklü D; Johnston W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 25957241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro investigation of the wear of human enamel by dental porcelain.
    Metzler KT; Woody RD; Miller AW; Miller BH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 10050125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wear performance of substructure ceramics and veneering porcelains.
    Preis V; Behr M; Kolbeck C; Hahnel S; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):796-804. PubMed ID: 21524788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Profilometer evaluation of the effect of various polishing methods on the surface roughness in dental ceramics of different structures subjected to repeated firings.
    Yilmaz K; Ozkan P
    Quintessence Int; 2010; 41(7):e125-31. PubMed ID: 20614035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of a low-fusing and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic material.
    Dalkiz M; Sipahi C; Beydemir B
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 19141045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of different polishing techniques for direct CAD/CAM ceramic restorations.
    Flury S; Lussi A; Zimmerli B
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 20672733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface characterization of feldspathic ceramic using ATR FT-IR and ellipsometry after various silanization protocols.
    Queiroz JR; Benetti P; Ozcan M; de Oliveira LF; Della Bona A; Takahashi FE; Bottino MA
    Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 22035984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of glaze thickness on the fracture toughness and hardness of alumina-reinforced porcelain.
    Baharav H; Laufer BZ; Pilo R; Cardash HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):515-9. PubMed ID: 10220654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments.
    Amer R; Kürklü D; Kateeb E; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1151-5. PubMed ID: 24836531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glass-ceramics and composites.
    Kantorski KZ; Scotti R; Valandro LF; Bottino MA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(7):740-7; quiz 748-9, 768. PubMed ID: 19014037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.