These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20379676)

  • 1. Effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains.
    Sarikaya I; Güler AU
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 20379676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Yuzbasioglu E; Bal S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of fluoride and 10% carbamide peroxide on the surface roughness of low-fusing and ultra low-fusing porcelain.
    Butler CJ; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Thompson GA; Runyan DA; Anthony von Fraunhofer J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 15295328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of a low-fusing and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic material.
    Dalkiz M; Sipahi C; Beydemir B
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 19141045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the finishing technique on surface roughness of dental porcelains with different microstructures.
    Sasahara RM; Ribeiro Fda C; Cesar PF; Yoshimura HN
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 17024946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface roughness of a dental ceramic after polishing with different vehicles and diamond pastes.
    Camacho GB; Vinha D; Panzeri H; Nonaka T; Gonçalves M
    Braz Dent J; 2006; 17(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 17262123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of different polishing techniques for direct CAD/CAM ceramic restorations.
    Flury S; Lussi A; Zimmerli B
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 20672733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of surface-finishing protocols on the roughness, color change, and translucency of different ceramic systems.
    Akar GC; Pekkan G; Çal E; Eskitaşçıoğlu G; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 24513427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of extraoral porcelain polishing sequences on surface roughness and color of feldspathic porcelain.
    Yuzugullu B; Celik C; Erkut S; Ozcelik TB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):472-5. PubMed ID: 20095196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three systems for the polishing of an ultra-low fusing dental porcelain.
    Wright MD; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E; Thompson GA; Runyan DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 15523338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic.
    Bottino MC; Valandro LF; Kantorski KZ; Bressiani JC; Bottino MA
    Braz Dent J; 2006; 17(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 17262140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the surface roughness of feldspathic porcelain polished with a novel alumina-zirconia paste or diamond paste.
    Yamockul S; Thamrongananskul N; Poolthong S
    Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 27251992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer.
    Tholt de Vasconcellos B; Miranda-Júnior WG; Prioli R; Thompson J; Oda M
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 16924984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Two Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Topography, and Flexural Strength of a Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic.
    Mohammadibassir M; Rezvani MB; Golzari H; Moravej Salehi E; Fahimi MA; Kharazi Fard MJ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e172-e180. PubMed ID: 28273681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of different polishing methods on roughness and color stability of air-abraded restorative materials after artificial accelerated aging.
    Ozdogan MS; Unsal G; Aydemir KA; Tural M; Aykent F
    Am J Dent; 2024 Jun; 37(3):141-146. PubMed ID: 38899994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro investigation of the wear of human enamel by dental porcelain.
    Metzler KT; Woody RD; Miller AW; Miller BH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 10050125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments.
    Amer R; Kürklü D; Kateeb E; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1151-5. PubMed ID: 24836531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of polishing and finishing procedures on the surface integrity of restorative ceramics.
    Odatsu T; Jimbo R; Wennerberg A; Watanabe I; Sawase T
    Am J Dent; 2013 Feb; 26(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 23724550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness and phase transformation of zirconia and the durability of the polishing systems.
    Park C; Vang MS; Park SW; Lim HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):430-437. PubMed ID: 28088308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.