343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20379680)
1. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations.
Rodrigues Junior SA; Pin LF; Machado G; Della Bona A; Demarco FF
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
Owens BM; Johnson WW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials.
Cenci MS; Piva E; Potrich F; Formolo E; Demarco FF; Powers JM
Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 15322639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems.
Owens BM; Johnson WW; Harris EF
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 16536195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
