343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20379680)
21. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effectiveness of an infiltrant on sealing of composite restoration margins with/without artificial caries.
Tulunoglu O; Tulunoglu IF; Antonson SA; Campillo-Funollet M; Antonson D; Munoz-Viveros C
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):717-25. PubMed ID: 25825096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
Owens BM; Johnson WW
J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement.
Smith ED; Martin FE
Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1533112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems.
Yap AU; Ho KS; Wong KM
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Sep; 25(9):666-71. PubMed ID: 9758395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques.
Beznos C
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 11203779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Microleakage of composite and two types of glass ionomer restorations with saliva contamination at different steps.
Farmer SN; Ludlow SW; Donaldson ME; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 24717701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study.
Fourie J; Smit CF
SADJ; 2011 Aug; 66(7):320-4. PubMed ID: 23198465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems.
Cenci MS; Lund RG; Pereira CL; de Carvalho RM; Demarco FF
J Adhes Dent; 2006 Apr; 8(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 16708725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of dentin deproteinization on microleakage of Class V composite restorations.
Toledano M; Perdigão J; Osorio R; Osorio E
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 11203862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of Cavity Margin Design and Restorative Material on Marginal Quality and Seal of Extended Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro.
Soliman S; Preidl R; Karl S; Hofmann N; Krastl G; Klaiber B
J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 26814320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations.
Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Wernecke KD; Roulet JF
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):401-10. PubMed ID: 11203848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
Krejci I; Lutz F
J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
