BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20379741)

  • 1. Negative numbers eliminate, but do not reverse, the attentional SNARC effect.
    Dodd MD
    Psychol Res; 2011 Jan; 75(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 20379741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of number-space associations: SNARC effects and spatial attention in 7- to 11-year-olds.
    Pan Y; Han X; Mei G; Bai X; Chen Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212204. PubMed ID: 30861008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional SNARC: there's something special about numbers (let us count the ways).
    Dodd MD; Van der Stigchel S; Adil Leghari M; Fung G; Kingstone A
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):810-8. PubMed ID: 18538756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ups and downs (and lefts and rights) of synaesthetic number forms: validation from spatial cueing and SNARC-type tasks.
    Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Maxwell EC; Nicholls ME; Smilek D
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1190-9. PubMed ID: 19660746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What information is critical to elicit interference in number-form synaesthesia?
    Hubbard EM; Ranzini M; Piazza M; Dehaene S
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1200-16. PubMed ID: 19698941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A working memory account of the interaction between numbers and spatial attention.
    van Dijck JP; Abrahamse EL; Acar F; Ketels B; Fias W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(8):1500-13. PubMed ID: 24749504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Rotondaro F; Doricchi F
    Cortex; 2015 Dec; 73():298-316. PubMed ID: 26520681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Components representation of negative numbers: evidence from auditory stimuli detection and number classification tasks.
    Kong F; Zhao J; You X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):691-701. PubMed ID: 22133233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numbers and space: a cognitive illusion?
    Dolores de Hevia M; Girelli L; Vallar G
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):254-64. PubMed ID: 16044296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space-number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants).
    Pellegrino M; Pinto M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Rossi-Arnaud C; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 237(10):2633-2643. PubMed ID: 31384968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
    Patro K; Shaki S
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Goal-directed reaching: the SNARC effect influences movement planning but not movement execution.
    Bingley T; Heath M
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(3):223-40. PubMed ID: 21864464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automaticity of access to numerical magnitude and its spatial associations: The role of task and number representation.
    Cleland AA; Bull R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):333-348. PubMed ID: 29708369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
    Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. It takes just one word to quash a SNARC.
    Fischer MH; Shaki S; Cruise A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 19447752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The SNARC effect in the processing of second-language number words: further evidence for strong lexico-semantic connections.
    De Brauwer J; Duyck W; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):444-58. PubMed ID: 17853205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numbers around Descartes: A preregistered study on the three-dimensional SNARC effect.
    Aleotti S; Di Girolamo F; Massaccesi S; Priftis K
    Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104111. PubMed ID: 31731115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.