These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20379741)

  • 41. The SNARC effect in two dimensions: Evidence for a frontoparallel mental number plane.
    Hesse PN; Bremmer F
    Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():85-96. PubMed ID: 27836333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.
    Zhou B
    Cogn Process; 2008 Aug; 9(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 18327623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands.
    Roettger TB; Domahs F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1231-48. PubMed ID: 25384199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Endogenous orienting is reduced during the attentional blink.
    Du F; Abrams RA
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Aug; 205(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 20625704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Small on the left, large on the right: numbers orient visual attention onto space in preverbal infants.
    Bulf H; de Hevia MD; Macchi Cassia V
    Dev Sci; 2016 May; 19(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 26074348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Instructional Dependency of SNARC Effects Reveals Flexibility of the Space-Magnitude Association of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Magnitudes.
    Lee D; Chun J; Cho S
    Perception; 2016 May; 45(5):552-67. PubMed ID: 27151510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Numbers reorient visuo-spatial attention during cancellation tasks.
    Di Luca S; Pesenti M; Vallar G; Girelli L
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 225(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 23307158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Rapid communication The mental number line dominates alternative, explicit coding of number magnitude.
    Dollman J; Levine WH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 26445276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms.
    Santangelo V; Van der Lubbe RH; Belardinelli MO; Postma A
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 16489435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Are numbers, size and brightness equally efficient in orienting visual attention? Evidence from an eye-tracking study.
    Bulf H; Macchi Cassia V; de Hevia MD
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99499. PubMed ID: 24932753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.
    Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task.
    Doricchi F; Macci E; Silvetti M; Macaluso E
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1574-85. PubMed ID: 19846472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Attentional shifts induced by uninformative number symbols modulate neural activity in human occipital cortex.
    Goffaux V; Martin R; Dormal G; Goebel R; Schiltz C
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3419-28. PubMed ID: 23044279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Attentional prioritizations based on spatial probabilities can be maintained on multiple moving objects.
    Feria CS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):926-38. PubMed ID: 20436190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Beyond time and space: The effect of a lateralized sustained attention task and brain stimulation on spatial and selective attention.
    Shalev N; De Wandel L; Dockree P; Demeyere N; Chechlacz M
    Cortex; 2018 Oct; 107():131-147. PubMed ID: 29061290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Manual response preparation and saccade programming are linked to attention shifts: ERP evidence for covert attentional orienting and spatially specific modulations of visual processing.
    Eimer M; Van Velzen J; Gherri E; Press C
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 16448629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Interaction of attention and temporal object priming.
    Bauer F; Usher M; Müller HJ
    Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):287-301. PubMed ID: 19066944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A different outlook on time: visual and auditory month names elicit different mental vantage points for a time-space synaesthete.
    Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Stewart MT; Maxwell EC; Smilek D
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1217-28. PubMed ID: 19665700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.