These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20380063)

  • 1. A computer assist. Detection systems draw mixed reviews in radiology.
    Rhea S
    Mod Healthc; 2010 Mar; 40(12):50, 52. PubMed ID: 20380063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vioxx, radiology, and the Food and Drug Administration.
    Pentecost MJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):394-7. PubMed ID: 17411841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic x-ray equipment performance standard; request for comments and information--FDA. Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
    Fed Regist; 1997 Dec; 62(238):65235-7. PubMed ID: 10176581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FDA examining computer diagnosis.
    Hamilton RA
    FDA Consum; 1995 Sep; 29(7):20-4. PubMed ID: 10145088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monolayer slide preparation and automated slide reading systems for cervical cancer screening--clinical-effectiveness analysis.
    Tecnologica MAP Suppl; 1998 Feb; ():34-9. PubMed ID: 10183359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Missing evidence.
    Hayes WS
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2008 Oct; 40(10):68. PubMed ID: 18988559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Report from the meeting of the Circulatory System Devices Panel of the Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiologic Health: September 21, 2004.
    Maisel WH;
    Circulation; 2005 Apr; 111(16):2143-5. PubMed ID: 15851621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Let the spin begin. Greater transparency urged for device trials.
    Becker C
    Mod Healthc; 2005 Mar; 35(11):33. PubMed ID: 15794228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FDA's device inspection lacking. Two reports point to technology, staffing as key culprits.
    Rhea S
    Mod Healthc; 2008 Feb; 38(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 18318369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical technology development and approval: the future is now.
    Kereiakes DJ; Willerson JT
    Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(25):3078-80. PubMed ID: 15226223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drug-eluting stents "deliver heartburn": how do we spell relief going forward?
    Krucoff MW; Boam A; Schultz DG
    Circulation; 2007 Jun; 115(23):2990-4. PubMed ID: 17473280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FDA perspective on clinical trial design for cardiovascular devices.
    Chen E; Sapirstein W; Ahn C; Swain J; Zuckerman B
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 82(3):773-5. PubMed ID: 16928481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical devices and the US Food and Drug Administration: regulating the tools of radiology.
    Henderson JA; Smith JJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):504-10. PubMed ID: 17411867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Legal overprotection.
    Friedman JH
    Med Health R I; 2004 Oct; 87(10):294. PubMed ID: 15559378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advisory committees" critical to the FDA's product review process.
    Rados C
    FDA Consum; 2004; 38(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 15032199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Center for Devices and Radiological health: an update.
    Donawa M
    Med Device Technol; 2001 Dec; 12(10):24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 15966141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In the hot seat. Study questions FDA's fast-track process.
    McKinney M
    Mod Healthc; 2011 Feb; 41(8):16. PubMed ID: 21608192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical devices and the approval processes: United States vs France.
    Braillon A
    Arch Intern Med; 2010 Dec; 170(22):2040-1. PubMed ID: 21149766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FDA recalls not as alarming as they seem.
    Connor JT; Lewis RJ; Berry DA; Berry SM
    Arch Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 171(11):1044-5; author reply 1045-6. PubMed ID: 21670380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revised draft guidance document for breast implants.
    FDA Consum; 2004; 38(2):4. PubMed ID: 15101353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.