These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20380550)

  • 21. Referrals for expert psychiatric opinion on dangerous offenders: a survey of instructions regarding defendants liable on conviction to a statutory assessment of dangerousness.
    Bickle A; Stankard P
    Med Sci Law; 2008 Jul; 48(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 18754206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Psychiatric evidence on the ultimate issue.
    Buchanan A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 16585229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Rethinking criminal responsibility: practical application of operational diagnosis and gnostic into expert testimony].
    Okada T
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2005; 107(9):920-35. PubMed ID: 16305187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Characteristics of murder and attempted murder in Cameroon. Study based on expert psychiatric court reports].
    Mbassa Menick D
    Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Jun; 69(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 19702147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Criminal responsibility in Asperger's syndrome.
    Katz N; Zemishlany Z
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2006; 43(3):166-73. PubMed ID: 17294982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are psychiatrists affecting the legal process by answering legal questions?
    Hardie T; Elcock S; Mackay RD
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2008; 18(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 18383199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. "Hired guns," "whores," and "prostitutes": case law references to clinicians of ill repute.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):414-25. PubMed ID: 10509941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Decision of German Supreme Court on July 30, 1999 relating to scientific evidence requirements for psychological expert opinion with respect to credibility of testimony and its consequences for future expert consultation].
    Balloff R
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2000 Apr; 49(4):261-74. PubMed ID: 10850124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Psychiatric treatment sentences].
    Stevens H; Nordentoft M; Agerbo E; Mortensen PB
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2010 Aug; 172(35):2366-70. PubMed ID: 20825740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Should human figure drawings be admitted into court?
    Lally SJ
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Feb; 76(1):135-49. PubMed ID: 11206294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sexual offenders in preventive detention: data concerning the inmates and expert witness practice.
    Habermeyer E; Passow D; Puhlmann P; Vohs K; Herpertz S
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):373-84. PubMed ID: 18378629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The CHESS method of forensic opinion formulation: striving to checkmate bias.
    Wills CD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 19092072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Role of psychiatrists in capital punishment cases : a review].
    Nakajima N
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2002; 104(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 11985117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Factors associated with agreement between experts in evidence about psychiatric injury.
    Large MM; Nielssen O
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):515-21. PubMed ID: 19092070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court.
    Gutheil TG
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2000; 37(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 10994298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [On the work of Austrian authorised experts on procedures in custodial and visiting rights--a survey of current practice from the parents and children view].
    Vöelkl-Kernstock S; Bein N; Gutschner D; Klicpera C; Ponocny-Seliger E; Friedrich MH
    Neuropsychiatr; 2008; 22(4):268-76. PubMed ID: 19080998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Methodologic considerations of the competence of psychiatric and psychological experts for criminal cases (with regard to Penal Code I and II)].
    Haddenbrock S
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1972; 29():17-25. PubMed ID: 5081971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Addressing the perfect phantom on the witness stand.
    Brodsky SL; Heller P
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):541-3. PubMed ID: 19092073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Automatism and the law in Norway 1981-2000].
    Hartvig P; Rosenqvist R; Stang HJ
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2003 Jun; 123(13-14):1831-4. PubMed ID: 12830256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Law-medicine notes. Uncertainty in prognosis of violent conduct: the Supreme Court lays down the law.
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Jun; 310(25):1651-2. PubMed ID: 6727936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.