127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20380617)
1. Radiographic absorptiometry for pre-screening of osteoporosis in patients with low energy fractures.
Buch I; Oturai PS; Jensen LT
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2010 Jul; 70(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 20380617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proximal Femur Hounsfield Units on CT Colonoscopy Correlate With Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry.
Christensen DL; Nappo KE; Wolfe JA; Wade SM; Brooks DI; Potter BK; Forsberg JA; Tintle SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Apr; 477(4):850-860. PubMed ID: 30811362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of risk indices for identifying low bone mineral density and osteoporosis in Mexican Mestizo women with rheumatoid arthritis.
Gonzalez-Lopez L; Gamez-Nava JI; Vega-Lopez A; Rodriguez-Jimenez NA; Gonzalez-Montoya N; Aguilar-Chavez E; Alcaraz-Lopez MF; Rocha-Muñoz AD; Castro-Lizano N; Morales-Romero J; Salazar-Paramo M; Suarez-Almazor ME
J Rheumatol; 2012 Feb; 39(2):247-53. PubMed ID: 22174197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic absorptiometry as a screening tool in male osteoporosis: results from the Odense Androgen Study.
Hansen SJ; Nielsen MM; Ryg J; Wraae K; Andersen M; Brixen K
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 19488892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women.
Fiter J; Nolla JM; Gómez-Vaquero C; Martínez-Aguilá D; Valverde J; Roig-Escofet D
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 11527054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic efficacy of Hounsfield units in spine CT for the assessment of real bone mineral density of degenerative spine: correlation study between T-scores determined by DEXA scan and Hounsfield units from CT.
Choi MK; Kim SM; Lim JK
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Jul; 158(7):1421-7. PubMed ID: 27177734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interest of a prescreening questionnaire to reduce the cost of bone densitometry.
Ben Sedrine W; Broers P; Devogelaer JP; Depresseux G; Kaufman JM; Goemaere S; Reginster JY
Osteoporos Int; 2002 May; 13(5):434-42. PubMed ID: 12086356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Osteoporosis: what are the implications of DEXA scanning 'high risk' women in primary care?
Thomas E; Richardson JC; Irvine A; Hassell AB; Hay EM
Fam Pract; 2003 Jun; 20(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 12738698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan Versus Computed Tomography for Bone Density Assessment.
Alawi M; Begum A; Harraz M; Alawi H; Bamagos S; Yaghmour A; Hafiz L
Cureus; 2021 Feb; 13(2):e13261. PubMed ID: 33717764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The accuracy of bone mineral density at distal radius on non-forearm osteoporosis identification.
Trivitayaratana W; Trivitayaratana P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):566-71. PubMed ID: 11460970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DEXA sensitivity analysis in patients with adult spinal deformity.
Gupta A; Upadhyaya S; Patel A; Fogel HA; Cha T; Schwab J; Bono C; Hershman S
Spine J; 2020 Feb; 20(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 31479779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone densitometry: comparison of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to radiographic absorptiometry.
Swezey RL; Draper D; Swezey AM
J Rheumatol; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1734-8. PubMed ID: 8895150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The exclusion of high trauma fractures may underestimate the prevalence of bone fragility fractures in the community: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
Sanders KM; Pasco JA; Ugoni AM; Nicholson GC; Seeman E; Martin TJ; Skoric B; Panahi S; Kotowicz MA
J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1337-42. PubMed ID: 9718203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in patients with beta-thalassemia major with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography: a comparison study.
Angelopoulos NG; Katounda E; Rombopoulos G; Goula A; Kaltzidou V; Kaltsas D; Ioannis P; Tolis G
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2006 Feb; 28(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 16462577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of total-body measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual-photon absorptiometry.
Nuti R; Martini G; Righi G; Frediani B; Turchetti V
J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Jul; 6(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 1950673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel MRI-based score for assessment of bone density in operative spine patients.
Ehresman J; Pennington Z; Schilling A; Lubelski D; Ahmed AK; Cottrill E; Khan M; Sciubba DM
Spine J; 2020 Apr; 20(4):556-562. PubMed ID: 31683066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discordantly high spinal bone mineral density values in patients with adult lumbar scoliosis.
Pappou IP; Girardi FP; Sandhu HS; Parvataneni HK; Cammisa FP; Schneider R; Frelinghuysen P; Lane JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(14):1614-20. PubMed ID: 16778698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
