These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20381009)

  • 1. Three-dimensional spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility for visual signals with hand and foot controls.
    Chan AH; Chan KW
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Oct; 41(6):840-8. PubMed ID: 20381009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial stimulus response compatibility for a horizontal visual display with hand and foot controls.
    Chan KW; Chan AH
    Ergonomics; 2011 Mar; 54(3):233-45. PubMed ID: 21390953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing.
    Stins JF; Michaels CF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):569-89. PubMed ID: 10881619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of operator orientation on relative organizational mapping and spatial compatibility.
    Chua R; Weeks DJ; Ricker KL; Poon P
    Ergonomics; 2001 Jun; 44(8):751-65. PubMed ID: 11450874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect.
    Roswarski TE; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 12589449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Spatial compatibility and position of the effectors].
    Nicoletti R; Umiltà C; Làdavas E
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1983 Nov; 59(11):1687-92. PubMed ID: 6667310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Spatial stimulus-response compatibility: presentation of stimuli within one visual hemifield].
    Nicoletti R; Anzola GP; Rizzolatti G; Umiltà C
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1980 Jul; 56(13):1426-31. PubMed ID: 7448039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Right hand presence modulates shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention in near perihand space.
    Lloyd DM; Azañón E; Poliakoff E
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Jul; 73(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 20403655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shared learning shapes human performance: Transfer effects in task sharing.
    Milanese N; Iani C; Rubichi S
    Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 20381024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synchronous and asynchronous presentations of auditory and visual signals: Implications for control console design.
    Chan AH; Chan KW
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Mar; 37(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 16102721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.
    Nakamoto H; Mori S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():179-88. PubMed ID: 18048011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorisation in visual memory.
    Derbyshire N; Ellis R; Tucker M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 May; 122(1):74-98. PubMed ID: 16376844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anticipatory response control in motor sequence learning: evidence from stimulus-response compatibility.
    Koch I
    Hum Mov Sci; 2007 Apr; 26(2):257-74. PubMed ID: 17346838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual guidance modulates hemispheric asymmetries during an interlimb coordination task.
    Woolley DG; Wenderoth N; Heuninckx S; Zhang X; Callaert D; Swinnen SP
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 50(4):1566-77. PubMed ID: 20079443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mapping the identity of a viewed hand in the motor system: evidence from stimulus-response compatibility.
    Vainio L; Mustonen T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):207-21. PubMed ID: 21142380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic imitation of intransitive actions.
    Press C; Bird G; Walsh E; Heyes C
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18077067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Movement compatibility for configurations of displays located in three cardinal orientations and ipsilateral, contralateral and overhead controls.
    Chan AH; Hoffmann ER
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):128-40. PubMed ID: 21531381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time course analyses confirm independence of imitative and spatial compatibility.
    Catmur C; Heyes C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):409-21. PubMed ID: 20731523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.