106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20381289)
1. Patterns of cement distribution in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Falez F; Favetti F; Casella F; Papalia M; Panegrossi G
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Oct; 25(7):1162-7. PubMed ID: 20381289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Results of hip resurfacing.
Falez F; Favetti F; Casella F; Papalia M; Panegrossi G
Int Orthop; 2011 Feb; 35(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 21234563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cementing techniques for hip resurfacing arthroplasty: in vitro study of pressure and temperature.
Bitsch RG; Loidolt T; Heisel C; Schmalzried TP
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jan; 26(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 20097035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cementing technique in femoral resurfacing.
Beckmann J; Goldapp C; Ringleff K; Schaumburger J; Grifka J; Perlick L
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Oct; 129(10):1317-25. PubMed ID: 18802712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of implant size on cement filling in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
de Haan R; Buls N; Scheerlinck T
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Jan; 228(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24170701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A mechanical analysis of femoral resurfacing implantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Sakagoshi D; Kabata T; Umemoto Y; Sakamoto J; Tomita K
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Dec; 25(8):1282-9. PubMed ID: 19879726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Femoral cementing technique for hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Bitsch RG; Heisel C; Silva M; Schmalzried TP
J Orthop Res; 2007 Apr; 25(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 17262829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the cementing technique on the cement mantle in hip resurfacing: an in vitro computed tomography scan-based analysis.
Scheerlinck T; Delport H; Kiewitt T
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Feb; 92(2):375-87. PubMed ID: 20124065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of bone density on the cement fixation of femoral hip resurfacing components.
Bitsch RG; Jäger S; Lürssen M; Loidolt T; Schmalzried TP; Clarius M
J Orthop Res; 2010 Aug; 28(8):986-91. PubMed ID: 20162694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of cement viscosity on cement-bone apposition and strength: an in vitro model with medullary bleeding.
Miller MA; Race A; Gupta S; Higham P; Clarke MT; Mann KA
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jan; 22(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 17197317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Periprosthetic bone cement allocation at the femoral durom hip prosthesis. a pilot study: artificial bone models versus ex-vivo femura].
Barbe AG; Spennes J; Follmann A; Plumhans C; de la Fuente M; Mumme T
Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):429-35. PubMed ID: 20714983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cementing techniques in hip resurfacing.
Chandler M; Kowalski RS; Watkins ND; Briscoe A; New AM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Feb; 220(2):321-31. PubMed ID: 16669398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cement applicator use for hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Jaeger S; Rieger JS; Obermeyer B; Klotz MC; Kretzer JP; Bitsch RG
Med Eng Phys; 2015 May; 37(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 25772262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What is the upper limit of cement penetration for different femoral hip resurfacing components?
Bitsch RG; Obermeyer BJ; Rieger JS; Jäger S; Schmalzried TP; Bischel OE
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Apr; 28(4):654-62. PubMed ID: 23246349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.
Cross M; Bostrom M
Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of low-viscosity cement on mantle morphology and femoral stem micromotion: a cadaver model with simulated blood flow.
Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA; Higham PA
Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):607-16. PubMed ID: 16929438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
