These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20381417)

  • 1. Veridical and false feedback sensitivity and punishment-reward system (BIS/BAS): ERP amplitude and theta frequency band analysis.
    Balconi M; Crivelli D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 121(9):1502-1510. PubMed ID: 20381417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FRN and P300 ERP effect modulation in response to feedback sensitivity: the contribution of punishment-reward system (BIS/BAS) and behaviour identification of action.
    Balconi M; Crivelli D
    Neurosci Res; 2010 Feb; 66(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 19895858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Error monitoring functions in response to an external feedback when an explicit judgement is required: ERP modulation and cortical source localisation.
    Balconi M; Scioli S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 22119662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Event-related components of the punishment and reward sensitivity.
    De Pascalis V; Varriale V; D'Antuono L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 121(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 19900840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Baseline EEG theta/beta ratio and punishment sensitivity as biomarkers for feedback-related negativity (FRN) and risk-taking.
    Massar SA; Rossi V; Schutter DJ; Kenemans JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Oct; 123(10):1958-65. PubMed ID: 22542439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity to punishment and reward omission: evidence from error-related ERP components.
    Boksem MA; Tops M; Kostermans E; De Cremer D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 18571302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Error-related ERP components and individual differences in punishment and reward sensitivity.
    Boksem MA; Tops M; Wester AE; Meijman TF; Lorist MM
    Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 1101(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 16784728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time-frequency theta and delta measures index separable components of feedback processing in a gambling task.
    Bernat EM; Nelson LD; Baskin-Sommers AR
    Psychophysiology; 2015 May; 52(5):626-37. PubMed ID: 25581491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociable effects of reward and expectancy during evaluative feedback processing revealed by topographic ERP mapping analysis.
    Gheza D; Paul K; Pourtois G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):213-225. PubMed ID: 29179993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of reward context on feedback processing as indexed by time-frequency analysis.
    Watts ATM; Bernat EM
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Sep; 55(9):e13195. PubMed ID: 29750361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociating absolute and relative reward- and punishment-related electrocortical processing: An event-related potential study.
    Wischnewski M; Schutter DJLG
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():13-19. PubMed ID: 29481828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing.
    Glazer JE; Kelley NJ; Pornpattananangkul N; Mittal VA; Nusslock R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):184-202. PubMed ID: 29454641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The electrocortical response to rewarding and aversive feedback: The reward positivity does not reflect salience in simple gambling tasks.
    Mulligan EM; Hajcak G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):262-267. PubMed ID: 29183793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender differences in reward and punishment for monetary and social feedback in children: An ERP study.
    Ding Y; Wang E; Zou Y; Song Y; Xiao X; Huang W; Li Y
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174100. PubMed ID: 28346515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Substance use underlying behavior: investigation of theta and high frequency oscillations in emotionally relevant situations.
    Knyazev GG; Slobodskoy-Plusnin JY
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 40(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 19278126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials.
    Pfabigan DM; Alexopoulos J; Bauer H; Sailer U
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 21039585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age, sex and individual differences in punishment sensitivity: factors influencing the feedback-related negativity.
    Santesso DL; Dzyundzyak A; Segalowitz SJ
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Nov; 48(11):1481-1489. PubMed ID: 21711354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of reward and punishment motivation on behavior monitoring as indexed by the error-related negativity.
    Potts GF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Sep; 81(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 21855583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feedback information and the reward positivity.
    Cockburn J; Holroyd CB
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):243-251. PubMed ID: 29208491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociable effects of reward magnitude on fronto-medial theta and FRN during performance monitoring.
    Paul K; Vassena E; Severo MC; Pourtois G
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Feb; 57(2):e13481. PubMed ID: 31578739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.