312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20381430)
1. The difference in spine specimen dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density between in situ and in vitro scans.
Tan JS; Kayanja MM; St Clair SF
Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):784-8. PubMed ID: 20381430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Failure strength of human vertebrae: prediction using bone mineral density measured by DXA and bone volume by micro-CT.
Perilli E; Briggs AM; Kantor S; Codrington J; Wark JD; Parkinson IH; Fazzalari NL
Bone; 2012 Jun; 50(6):1416-25. PubMed ID: 22430313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual-energy CT-based phantomless in vivo three-dimensional bone mineral density assessment of the lumbar spine.
Wichmann JL; Booz C; Wesarg S; Kafchitsas K; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Lehnert T; Vogl TJ; Khan MF
Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):778-84. PubMed ID: 24475863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lumbar spine bone mineral density Z-score discrepancies by dual X-ray absorptiometry do not predict vertebral fractures in children.
Harindhanavudhi T; Petryk A; Jones R; Regodón Wallin A; Hodges JS; Nortwick SV; Miller BS; Holm TL; Sarafoglou K
J Investig Med; 2018 Aug; 66(6):980-985. PubMed ID: 29622758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calcaneus as a site for assessment of bone mineral density: evaluation in cadavers and healthy volunteers.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):621-7. PubMed ID: 8352120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Black hole artifacts-a new potential pitfall for DXA accuracy?
Morgan SL; Lopez-Ben R; Nunnally N; Burroughs L; Fineberg N; Tubbs RS; Yester MV
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(2):266-75. PubMed ID: 18291695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thoracic Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Can Sensitively Monitor Bone Mineral Metabolism: Comparison of Thoracic QCT vs Lumbar QCT and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Detection of Age-relative Change in Bone Mineral Density.
Mao SS; Li D; Syed YS; Gao Y; Luo Y; Flores F; Child J; Cervantes M; Kalantar-Zadeh K; Budoff MJ
Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 28844601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: standard anteroposterior scans vs sub-regional analyses of whole-body scans.
Boyanov M
Br J Radiol; 2008 Aug; 81(968):637-42. PubMed ID: 18628333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of DXA scanning of the thoracic spine: cadaveric studies comparing BMC, areal BMD and geometric estimates of volumetric BMD against ash weight and CT measures of bone volume.
Sran MM; Khan KM; Keiver K; Chew JB; McKay HA; Oxland TR
Eur Spine J; 2005 Dec; 14(10):971-6. PubMed ID: 15616862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone health of children with intestinal failure measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and digital X-ray radiogrammetry.
Neelis E; Rijnen N; Sluimer J; Olieman J; Rizopoulos D; Wijnen R; Rings E; de Koning B; Hulst J
Clin Nutr; 2018 Apr; 37(2):687-694. PubMed ID: 28274657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DXA estimates of vertebral volumetric bone mineral density in children: potential advantages of paired posteroanterior and lateral scans.
Leonard MB; Shults J; Zemel BS
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 16931343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proximal femur specimens: automated 3D trabecular bone mineral density analysis at multidetector CT--correlation with biomechanical strength measurement.
Huber MB; Carballido-Gamio J; Bauer JS; Baum T; Eckstein F; Lochmüller EM; Majumdar S; Link TM
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):472-81. PubMed ID: 18430879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lateral spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement with fan-beam design: effect of osteophytic calcifications on lateral and anteroposterior spine BMD.
Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M; v Lilienfeld-Toal H
Rheumatol Int; 1995; 15(4):151-4. PubMed ID: 8835296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of the Lumbar Vertebral Malpositioning on Bone Mineral Density Measurements of the Lumbar Spine by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Izadyar S; Golbarg S; Takavar A; Zakariaee SS
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 26778450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Z-score comparability of bone mineral density reference databases for children.
Kocks J; Ward K; Mughal Z; Moncayo R; Adams J; Högler W
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2010 Oct; 95(10):4652-9. PubMed ID: 20668038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individualized evaluation of lumbar bone mineral density and bone mineral apparent density in children and adolescents.
Duran I; Martakis K; Rehberg M; Semler O; Schoenau E
Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Oct; 13(1):117. PubMed ID: 30374788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normal changes in spinal bone mineral density in a Chinese population: assessment by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Yu W; Qin M; Xu L; van Kuijk C; Meng X; Xing X; Cao J; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 9(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 10367047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Jergas M; Breitenseher M; Glüer CC; Yu W; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 7484286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DXA in vivo BMD methodology: an erroneous and misleading research and clinical gauge of bone mineral status, bone fragility, and bone remodelling.
Bolotin HH
Bone; 2007 Jul; 41(1):138-54. PubMed ID: 17481978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
