126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20382020)
1. Cost-benefit analysis of using large-format histology sections in routine diagnostic breast care.
Tot T
Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 20382020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Large sections in routine breast pathology. A technique adapted to conservative surgery].
Méchine-Neuville A; Chenard MP; Gairard B; Mathelin C; Bellocq JP
Ann Pathol; 2000 May; 20(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 10891733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical relevance of the distribution of the lesions in 500 consecutive breast cancer cases documented in large-format histologic sections.
Tot T
Cancer; 2007 Dec; 110(11):2551-60. PubMed ID: 17932896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases.
Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR
Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An improved process for breast cancer margin identification and orientation.
Beland M
AORN J; 2009 Oct; 90(4):525-9. PubMed ID: 19801004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the diagnostic methods on the therapeutic strategies.
Greco M; Agresti R; Giovanazzi R
Q J Nucl Med; 1998 Mar; 42(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 9646647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients.
Bakhshandeh M; Tutuncuoglu SO; Fischer G; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):656-9. PubMed ID: 17854083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Whole-specimen histopathology: a method to produce whole-mount breast serial sections for 3-D digital histopathology imaging.
Clarke GM; Eidt S; Sun L; Mawdsley G; Zubovits JT; Yaffe MJ
Histopathology; 2007 Jan; 50(2):232-42. PubMed ID: 17222252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early invasive carcinoma of the breast.
Frykberg ER; Bland KI
Curr Opin Gen Surg; 1993; ():316-24. PubMed ID: 7584001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A new method of complete peripheral margin assessment in breast conservative surgery using an adjustable polygonal prism mould].
Ichihara S; Mori Y; Moritani S; Sato Y
Rinsho Byori; 2003 Sep; 51(9):905-9. PubMed ID: 14560661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in management techniques and patterns of disease recurrence over time in patients with breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy at a single institution.
Pass H; Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Decker D; Pettinga J; Ingold J; Benitez P; Neumann K; Rebner M; Dekhne N; Martinez A
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 15305400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: a series of 400 procedures.
D'Halluin F; Tas P; Rouquette S; Bendavid C; Foucher F; Meshba H; Blanchot J; Coué O; Levêque J
Breast; 2009 Aug; 18(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 19515566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microinvasive breast carcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis of a single institution experience.
Padmore RF; Fowble B; Hoffman J; Rosser C; Hanlon A; Patchefsky AS
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(6):1403-9. PubMed ID: 10717623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins.
Cox CE; Pendas S; Ku NN; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HS; Nicosia SV
Am Surg; 1998 Jun; 64(6):533-7; discussion 537-8. PubMed ID: 9619174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload.
Rizzo M; Iyengar R; Gabram SG; Park J; Birdsong G; Chandler KL; Mosunjac MB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):228-34. PubMed ID: 19636625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ductal carcinoma in situ. The success of breast conservation therapy: a shared experience of two single institutional nonrandomized prospective studies.
Lagios MD; Silverstein MJ
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1997 Apr; 6(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 9115503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
