These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20382300)

  • 21. Kinematics in the terminal swing phase of unilateral transfemoral amputees: microprocessor-controlled versus swing-phase control prosthetic knees.
    Mâaref K; Martinet N; Grumillier C; Ghannouchi S; André JM; Paysant J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 91(6):919-25. PubMed ID: 20510984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biomechanics of ramp descent in unilateral trans-tibial amputees: Comparison of a microprocessor controlled foot with conventional ankle-foot mechanisms.
    Struchkov V; Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():164-70. PubMed ID: 26689894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of different microprocessor controlled knee joints on the energy consumption during walking in trans-femoral amputees: intelligent knee prosthesis (IP) versus C-leg.
    Chin T; Machida K; Sawamura S; Shiba R; Oyabu H; Nagakura Y; Takase I; Nakagawa A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Apr; 30(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 16739783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using a microprocessor knee (C-Leg) with appropriate foot transitioned individuals with dysvascular transfemoral amputations to higher performance levels: a longitudinal randomized clinical trial.
    Jayaraman C; Mummidisetty CK; Albert MV; Lipschutz R; Hoppe-Ludwig S; Mathur G; Jayaraman A
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 34034753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The utility of the single-subject method for comparison of temporal-spatial gait changes between a microprocessor and non-microprocessor prosthetic knees.
    Howard CL; Wallace C; Perry B; Stokic DS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):133-144. PubMed ID: 32186241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Absent loading response knee flexion: The impact on gait kinetics and centre of mass motion in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation, and the effect of microprocessor controlled knee provision.
    Carse B; Hebenton J; Brady L; Davie-Smith F
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 Aug; 108():106061. PubMed ID: 37556922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison between microprocessor-controlled ankle/foot and conventional prosthetic feet during stair negotiation in people with unilateral transtibial amputation.
    Agrawal V; Gailey RS; Gaunaurd IA; O'Toole C; Finnieston AA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(7):941-50. PubMed ID: 24301431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing the lower limb joint biomechanics of the Power Knee, C-Leg and Rheo Knee during ramp and stair ambulation.
    Kestur S; Zhou S; O'Sullivan G; Young A; Herrin K
    J Biomech; 2024 Jun; 171():112201. PubMed ID: 38936310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg and Mauch SNS prosthetic knees.
    Segal AD; Orendurff MS; Klute GK; McDowell ML; Pecoraro JA; Shofer J; Czerniecki JM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2006; 43(7):857-70. PubMed ID: 17436172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on ramp negotiation and community walking function in K2 level transfemoral amputees.
    Burnfield JM; Eberly VJ; Gronely JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Mulroy SJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Mar; 36(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 22223685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee.
    Hafner BJ; Willingham LL; Buell NC; Allyn KJ; Smith DG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 17270519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of a user-adaptive prosthetic knee on planned gait termination.
    Prinsen EC; Nederhand MJ; Koopman BF; Rietman JS
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1254-1259. PubMed ID: 28813993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors associated with a risk of prosthetic knee buckling during walking in unilateral transfemoral amputees.
    Hisano G; Hashizume S; Kobayashi Y; Murai A; Kobayashi T; Nakashima M; Hobara H
    Gait Posture; 2020 Mar; 77():69-74. PubMed ID: 31999980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Designs and performance of microprocessor-controlled knee joints.
    Thiele J; Westebbe B; Bellmann M; Kraft M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2014 Feb; 59(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 24176961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cross-Slope and Level Walking Strategies During Swing in Individuals With Lower Limb Amputation.
    Villa C; Loiret I; Langlois K; Bonnet X; Lavaste F; Fodé P; Pillet H
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 98(6):1149-1157. PubMed ID: 27832952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Significance of static prosthesis alignment for standing and walking of patients with lower limb amputation].
    Blumentritt S; Schmalz T; Jarasch R
    Orthopade; 2001 Mar; 30(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 11501007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimum toe clearance and tripping probability in people with unilateral transtibial amputation walking on ramps with different prosthetic designs.
    Riveras M; Ravera E; Ewins D; Shaheen AF; Catalfamo-Formento P
    Gait Posture; 2020 Sep; 81():41-48. PubMed ID: 32663775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Physical performance and self-report outcomes associated with use of passive, adaptive, and active prosthetic knees in persons with unilateral, transfemoral amputation: Randomized crossover trial.
    Hafner BJ; Askew RL
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(6):677-700. PubMed ID: 26560243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors leading to falls in transfemoral prosthesis users: a case series of prosthesis-side stumble recovery responses.
    King ST; Eveld ME; Zelik KE; Goldfarb M
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2024 Jul; 21(1):117. PubMed ID: 39003469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Subject-specific responses to an adaptive ankle prosthesis during incline walking.
    Lamers EP; Eveld ME; Zelik KE
    J Biomech; 2019 Oct; 95():109273. PubMed ID: 31431348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.