BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20382920)

  • 1. Variation in working memory capacity and episodic recall: the contributions of strategic encoding and contextual retrieval.
    Unsworth N; Spillers GJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Apr; 17(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 20382920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation in working memory capacity and episodic memory: examining the importance of encoding specificity.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA; Spillers GJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 21912997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working memory capacity and recall from long-term memory: Examining the influences of encoding strategies, study time allocation, search efficiency, and monitoring abilities.
    Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26076331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency.
    Miller AL; Unsworth N
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1149-1163. PubMed ID: 29845592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining variation in working memory capacity and retrieval in cued recall.
    Unsworth N
    Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):386-96. PubMed ID: 19358013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall.
    Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1020-34. PubMed ID: 17983310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working memory capacity and retrieval from long-term memory: the role of controlled search.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA; Spillers GJ
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Feb; 41(2):242-54. PubMed ID: 23055120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 21090906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contributions of primary and secondary memory to working memory capacity: an individual differences analysis of immediate free recall.
    Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):240-7. PubMed ID: 20053060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpolated retrieval effects on list isolation: Individual differences in working memory capacity.
    Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Kane MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):619-642. PubMed ID: 30725377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in working memory capacity and temporal-contextual retrieval from episodic memory.
    Spillers GJ; Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1532-9. PubMed ID: 21823812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working memory capacity and sustained attention: A cognitive-energetic perspective.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):77-103. PubMed ID: 30998072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, and episodic recall: a latent variable examination of differences in the dynamics of free recall.
    Unsworth N
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):837-49. PubMed ID: 19679863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in contextual storage: evidence from the list-strength effect.
    Sahakyan L; Abushanab B; Smith JR; Gray KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):873-81. PubMed ID: 24294917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does collaboration help or hurt recall? The answer depends on working memory capacity.
    Hood AVB; Whillock SR; Meade ML; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Mar; 49(3):350-370. PubMed ID: 36006719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of working memory capacity in autobiographical retrieval: individual differences in strategic search.
    Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA
    Memory; 2012; 20(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 22273543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory capacity predicts the beneficial effect of selective memory retrieval.
    Schlichting A; Aslan A; Holterman C; Bäuml KH
    Memory; 2015; 23(5):786-94. PubMed ID: 24946840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: an examination of differences in accessibility.
    Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2397-410. PubMed ID: 22800472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item-method directed forgetting and working memory capacity: A hierarchical multinomial modeling approach.
    Marevic I; Arnold NR; Rummel J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1070-1080. PubMed ID: 28326968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation.
    Bleckley MK; Durso FT; Crutchfield JM; Engle RW; Khanna MM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):884-9. PubMed ID: 15000535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.