BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20382920)

  • 21. Individual differences in the delayed execution of prospective memories.
    Ball BH; Knight JB; Dewitt MR; Brewer GA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2411-25. PubMed ID: 23679085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Temporal clustering and sequencing in short-term memory and episodic memory.
    Farrell S
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Apr; 119(2):223-71. PubMed ID: 22506678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1282-1311. PubMed ID: 28108977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Focusing on attention: the effects of working memory capacity and load on selective attention.
    Ahmed L; de Fockert JW
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e43101. PubMed ID: 22952636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retrieval of temporal structure at recall can occur automatically.
    Sadeh T; Moscovitch M
    Cognition; 2024 Jan; 242():105647. PubMed ID: 37857055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Increased distractibility in schizotypy: Independent of individual differences in working memory capacity?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Sörqvist P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):565-578. PubMed ID: 27028661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The rostral prefrontal cortex underlies individual differences in working memory capacity: An approach from the hierarchical model of the cognitive control.
    Minamoto T; Yaoi K; Osaka M; Osaka N
    Cortex; 2015 Oct; 71():277-90. PubMed ID: 26280275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The contribution of encoding and retrieval processes to proactive interference.
    Kliegl O; Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1778-89. PubMed ID: 25603166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of working memory capacity in retrieval.
    Rosen VM; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1997 Sep; 126(3):211-27. PubMed ID: 9281831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Individual differences in value-directed remembering.
    Elliott BL; McClure SM; Brewer GA
    Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104275. PubMed ID: 32387721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".
    Kane MJ; Poole BJ; Tuholski SW; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distraction control processes in free recall: benefits and costs to performance.
    Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hodgetts HM; Beaman CP; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):118-33. PubMed ID: 25329080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of semantic relatedness on recall of stimuli preceding emotional oddballs.
    Smith RM; Beversdorf DQ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Jul; 14(4):620-8. PubMed ID: 18577291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Individual differences in encoding strategies and free recall dynamics.
    Unsworth N; Miller AL; Robison MK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2495-2508. PubMed ID: 30975039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the relation between working memory capacity and the antisaccade task.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK; Miller AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1420-1447. PubMed ID: 34516206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neuroanatomical correlates of episodic encoding and retrieval in young and elderly subjects.
    Daselaar SM; Veltman DJ; Rombouts SA; Raaijmakers JG; Jonker C
    Brain; 2003 Jan; 126(Pt 1):43-56. PubMed ID: 12477696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of working memory capacity and lapses of attention for variation in error monitoring.
    Unsworth N; Miller AL; Robison MK
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 22(3):450-466. PubMed ID: 35426070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. High working memory capacity predicts less retrieval induced forgetting.
    Mall JT; Morey CC
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52806. PubMed ID: 23326359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Working memory predicts the rejection of false memories.
    Leding JK
    Memory; 2012; 20(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 22292532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of personality and working memory capacity on implicit learning.
    Guzmán Muñoz FJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Dec; 71(12):2603-2614. PubMed ID: 29313740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.