These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20382923)

  • 1. Polarity correspondence in comparative number magnitude judgments.
    Reber R; Wurtz P; Knapstad M; Lervik LV
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Apr; 17(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 20382923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SNARC effects with numerical and non-numerical symbolic comparative judgments: instructional and cultural dependencies.
    Shaki S; Petrusic WM; Leth-Steensen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):515-30. PubMed ID: 22288694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociating between cardinal and ordinal and between the value and size magnitudes of coins.
    Fitousi D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):889-94. PubMed ID: 21169585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid communication The mental number line dominates alternative, explicit coding of number magnitude.
    Dollman J; Levine WH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 26445276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paying attention to attention: evidence for an attentional contribution to the size congruity effect.
    Risko EF; Maloney EA; Fugelsang JA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1137-47. PubMed ID: 23709065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
    Patro K; Shaki S
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the relative speed account of number-size interference in comparative judgments of numerals.
    Schwarz W; Ischebeck A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Jun; 29(3):507-22. PubMed ID: 12848323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Congruency proportion reveals asymmetric processing of irrelevant physical and numerical dimensions in the size congruity paradigm.
    Borgmann K; Fugelsang J; Ansari D; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 21668091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial attention shifts contribute to the size congruity effect.
    Wang A; Pan Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Oct; 83(7):2795-2805. PubMed ID: 34282561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: the SNARC effect revisited.
    Fitousi D; Shaki S; Algom D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):143-55. PubMed ID: 19304604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SNARC-like congruency based on number magnitude and response duration.
    Kiesel A; Vierck E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):275-9. PubMed ID: 19210098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Embodied markedness of parity? Examining handedness effects on parity judgments.
    Huber S; Klein E; Graf M; Nuerk HC; Moeller K; Willmes K
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):963-77. PubMed ID: 25394996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing number-space associations: SNARC effects using a color discrimination task in 5-year-olds.
    Hoffmann D; Hornung C; Martin R; Schiltz C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Dec; 116(4):775-91. PubMed ID: 24055929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size bias in judgments of perceptual averages.
    Price PC; Kimura NM; Smith AR; Marshall LD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1321-31. PubMed ID: 24749965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decimals are not processed automatically, not even as being smaller than one.
    Kallai AY; Tzelgov J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):962-75. PubMed ID: 24548326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical and physical magnitudes are mapped into time.
    Ben-Meir S; Ganor-Stern D; Tzelgov J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2309-20. PubMed ID: 22643130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Count me in! On the automaticity of numerosity processing.
    Naparstek S; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1053-9. PubMed ID: 20565221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The number-weight illusion.
    Schwarz W; Reike D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):332-339. PubMed ID: 29752678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.