245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20383367)
1. Field performance of the Chemcatcher passive sampler for monitoring hydrophobic organic pollutants in surface water.
Vrana B; Mills GA; Leonards PE; Kotterman M; Weideborg M; Hajslová J; Kocourek V; Tomaniová M; Pulkrabová J; Suchanová M; Hájková K; Herve S; Ahkola H; Greenwood R
J Environ Monit; 2010 Apr; 12(4):863-72. PubMed ID: 20383367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calibration of the Chemcatcher passive sampler for the monitoring of priority organic pollutants in water.
Vrana B; Mills GA; Dominiak E; Greenwood R
Environ Pollut; 2006 Jul; 142(2):333-43. PubMed ID: 16343715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Chemcatcher and DGT passive samplers for monitoring metals with highly fluctuating water concentrations.
Allan IJ; Knutsson J; Guigues N; Mills GA; Fouillac AM; Greenwood R
J Environ Monit; 2007 Jul; 9(7):672-81. PubMed ID: 17607387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field uptake rates of hydrophobic organic contaminants by semipermeable membrane devices: environmental monitoring considerations.
Sanchez-Hernandez JC; Borghini F; Corral A; Grimalt JO
J Environ Monit; 2004 Nov; 6(11):919-25. PubMed ID: 15536507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Field performance of seven passive sampling devices for monitoring of hydrophobic substances.
Allan IJ; Booij K; Paschke A; Vrana B; Mills GA; Greenwood R
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jul; 43(14):5383-90. PubMed ID: 19708370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of housing geometry on the performance of Chemcatcher passive sampler for the monitoring of hydrophobic organic pollutants in water.
Lobpreis T; Vrana B; Dominiak E; Dercová K; Mills GA; Greenwood R
Environ Pollut; 2008 Jun; 153(3):706-10. PubMed ID: 17964701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short-term exposure testing of six different passive samplers for the monitoring of hydrophobic contaminants in water.
Allan IJ; Booij K; Paschke A; Vrana B; Mills GA; Greenwood R
J Environ Monit; 2010 Mar; 12(3):696-703. PubMed ID: 20445859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of sampler material on the uptake of PAHs into passive sampling devices.
Allan IJ; Harman C; Kringstad A; Bratsberg E
Chemosphere; 2010 Apr; 79(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 20138329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of five passive sampling devices for monitoring of pesticides in water.
Ahrens L; Daneshvar A; Lau AE; Kreuger J
J Chromatogr A; 2015 Jul; 1405():1-11. PubMed ID: 26087968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of in-situ calibration of Chemcatcher passive samplers for 322 micropollutants in agricultural and urban affected rivers.
Moschet C; Vermeirssen EL; Singer H; Stamm C; Hollender J
Water Res; 2015 Mar; 71():306-17. PubMed ID: 25647166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Levels and distribution of dissolved hydrophobic organic contaminants in the Morava river in Zlín district, Czech Republic as derived from their accumulation in silicone rubber passive samplers.
Prokeš R; Vrana B; Klánová J
Environ Pollut; 2012 Jul; 166():157-66. PubMed ID: 22504429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of the Chemcatcher passive sampler when used to monitor 10 polar and semi-polar pesticides in 16 Central European streams, and comparison with two other sampling methods.
Schäfer RB; Paschke A; Vrana B; Mueller R; Liess M
Water Res; 2008 May; 42(10-11):2707-17. PubMed ID: 18313096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chemcatcher and DGT passive sampling devices for regulatory monitoring of trace metals in surface water.
Allan IJ; Knutsson J; Guigues N; Mills GA; Fouillac AM; Greenwood R
J Environ Monit; 2008 Jul; 10(7):821-9. PubMed ID: 18688449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calibration of the Chemcatcher passive sampler for monitoring selected polar and semi-polar pesticides in surface water.
Gunold R; Schäfer RB; Paschke A; Schüürmann G; Liess M
Environ Pollut; 2008 Sep; 155(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 18068881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modelling and field application of the Chemcatcher passive sampler calibration data for the monitoring of hydrophobic organic pollutants in water.
Vrana B; Mills GA; Kotterman M; Leonards P; Booij K; Greenwood R
Environ Pollut; 2007 Feb; 145(3):895-904. PubMed ID: 16920239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the influence of meteorological parameters on the performance of polyurethane foam-based passive air samplers.
Klánová J; Eupr P; Kohoutek J; Harner T
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jan; 42(2):550-5. PubMed ID: 18284161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of Chemcatcher passive sampler for monitoring levels of mercury in contaminated river water.
Aguilar-Martínez R; Gómez-Gómez MM; Greenwood R; Mills GA; Vrana B; Palacios-Corvillo MA
Talanta; 2009 Feb; 77(4):1483-9. PubMed ID: 19084668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calibration and field performance of triolein embedded acetate membranes for passive sampling persistent organic pollutants in water.
Tang J; Chen S; Xu Y; Zhong W; Ma M; Wang Z
Environ Pollut; 2012 May; 164():158-63. PubMed ID: 22361054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calibration and field performance of membrane-enclosed sorptive coating for integrative passive sampling of persistent organic pollutants in water.
Vrana B; Paschke A; Popp P
Environ Pollut; 2006 Nov; 144(1):296-307. PubMed ID: 16516361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of the orientation and fluid flow on the accumulation of organotin compounds to Chemcatcher passive samplers.
Ahkola H; Juntunen J; Laitinen M; Krogerus K; Huttula T; Herve S; Witick A
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2015 Apr; 17(4):813-24. PubMed ID: 25758414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
