127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20383913)
1. Potential for 2 priority systems to be used as appropriateness of indication tools for cataract surgery.
Las Hayas C; Quintana JM; Espallargues M; Vrotsou K; Allepuz A; Escobar A; Moharra M
Can J Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 45(2):e1-7. PubMed ID: 20383913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 3 systems for assigning priority to patients on waiting lists for cataract extraction.
Quintana JM; Espallargues M; Las Hayas C; Allepuz A; Vrotsou K; Moharra M; Escobar A
Can J Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 45(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 20379295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can an appropriateness evaluation tool be used to prioritize patients on a waiting list for cataract extraction?
Las Hayas C; González N; Aguirre U; Blasco JA; Elizalde B; Perea E; Escobar A; Navarro G; Castells X; Quintana JM;
Health Policy; 2010 May; 95(2-3):194-203. PubMed ID: 20031251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The prioritization of patients on waiting lists for cataract surgery: validation of the Western Canada waiting list project cataract priority criteria tool.
Conner-Spady BL; Sanmugasunderam S; Courtright P; Mildon D; McGurran JJ; Noseworthy TW;
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 12(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 16019691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and assessment of a priority score for cataract surgery.
Fantini MP; Negro A; Accorsi S; Cisbani L; Taroni F; Grilli R
Can J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 39(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15040614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decision trees for indication of cataract surgery based on changes in visual acuity.
Quintana JM; Arostegui I; Alberdi T; Escobar A; Perea E; Navarro G; Elizalde B; Andradas E;
Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1471-8, 1478.e1-3. PubMed ID: 20416951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of priority criteria for cataract extraction.
Gutiérrez SG; Quintana JM; Bilbao A; Escobar A; Milla EP; Elizalde B; Baré M; Fernandez de Larrea N;
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(4):675-84. PubMed ID: 19674219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of newly developed appropriateness criteria for cataract surgery.
Quintana JM; Escobar A; Bilbao A; Blasco JA; Lacalle JR; Bare M; Begiristain JM;
Ophthalmology; 2009 Mar; 116(3):409-417.e3. PubMed ID: 18973949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. NIKE: a new clinical tool for establishing levels of indications for cataract surgery.
Lundström M; Albrecht S; Håkansson I; Lorefors R; Ohlsson S; Polland W; Schmid A; Svensson G; Wendel E
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Aug; 84(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 16879570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of appropriateness explicit criteria for cataract extraction by phacoemulsification.
Quintana JM; Escobar A; Aróstegui I
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Mar; 6():23. PubMed ID: 16512906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of a national system for waitlist prioritization: the experience with NIKE and cataract surgery in Sweden.
Ng JQ; Lundström M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 92(4):378-81. PubMed ID: 23764232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Developing cataract surgery priority criteria: results from the Western Canada Waiting List Project.
Romanchuk KG; Sanmugasunderam S; Hadorn DC;
Can J Ophthalmol; 2002 Apr; 37(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 12083473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient and physician perspectives of maximum acceptable waiting times for cataract surgery.
Conner-Spady BL; Sanmugasunderam S; Courtright P; Mildon D; McGurran JJ; Noseworthy TW;
Can J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 40(4):439-47. PubMed ID: 16116507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Waiting time for cataract extraction: Predictive factors and influence on outcomes.
Quintana JM; Garcia S; Bilbao A; Navarro G; Perea E; de Larrea NF; Begiristain JM;
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Jan; 37(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 21067891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Appropriateness of phacoemulsification in Spain.
de Larrea NF; Blasco JA; Aguirre U; García S; Elizalde B; Navarro G; Pérez S;
Int J Qual Health Care; 2010 Feb; 22(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 19969551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why are patients with no visual symptoms on cataract waiting lists?
Bellan L
Can J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 40(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 16116506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation in indications for cataract surgery in the United States, Denmark, Canada, and Spain: results from the International Cataract Surgery Outcomes Study.
Norregaard JC; Bernth-Petersen P; Alonso J; Dunn E; Black C; Andersen TF; Espallargues M; Bellan L; Anderson GF
Br J Ophthalmol; 1998 Oct; 82(10):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9924294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring outcomes of cataract surgery using the Visual Function Index-14.
Gothwal VK; Wright TA; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1181-8. PubMed ID: 20610098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Explicit criteria for prioritization of cataract surgery.
Ma Quintana J; Escobar A; Bilbao A;
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Mar; 6():24. PubMed ID: 16512893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recovery of visual and functional disability following cataract surgery in older people: Sunderland Cataract Study.
Gray CS; Karimova G; Hildreth AJ; Crabtree L; Allen D; O'connell JE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jan; 32(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 16516780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
