BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20384254)

  • 1. Evaluation of the spatial dependence of the point spread function in 2D PET image reconstruction using LOR-OSEM.
    Wiant D; Gersh JA; Bennett M; Bourland JD
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1169-82. PubMed ID: 20384254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.
    Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A GPU-accelerated fully 3D OSEM image reconstruction for a high-resolution small animal PET scanner using dual-ended readout detectors.
    Zeng T; Gao J; Gao D; Kuang Z; Sang Z; Wang X; Hu L; Chen Q; Chu X; Liang D; Liu X; Yang Y; Zheng H; Hu Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245007. PubMed ID: 32679581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental evaluation and basis function optimization of the spatially variant image-space PSF on the Ingenuity PET/MR scanner.
    Kotasidis FA; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):062501. PubMed ID: 24877835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative accuracy of MAP reconstruction for dynamic PET imaging in small animals.
    Cheng JC; Shoghi K; Laforest R
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1029-41. PubMed ID: 22320813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. LOR-OSEM: statistical PET reconstruction from raw line-of-response histograms.
    Kadrmas DJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 49(20):4731-44. PubMed ID: 15566171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of PET image reconstruction using a spatial resolution model.
    Andersen FL; Klausen TL; Loft A; Beyer T; Holm S
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):862-9. PubMed ID: 23254158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Accuracy of Resolution Recovery in PSF-based Fully-3D PET Image Reconstruction: Simulation and Phantom Study in Multicenter Trial].
    Kangai Y; Odajima S; Matsutomo N; Kamiya T; Mizuta T; Onishi H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 72(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 27000669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: an experimental evaluation.
    Tong S; Alessio AM; Kinahan PE
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1453-73. PubMed ID: 20150683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Iterative image reconstruction for positron emission tomography based on a detector response function estimated from point source measurements.
    Tohme MS; Qi J
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3709-25. PubMed ID: 19478379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT.
    Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ
    Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing scan time and bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in copper-64 PET/CT imaging: a phantom study.
    Monsef A; Sheikhzadeh P; Steiner JR; Sadeghi F; Yazdani M; Ghafarian P
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38608316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
    Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery and time of flight modeling for
    Matheoud R; Lecchi M; Lizio D; Scabbio C; Marcassa C; Leva L; Del Sole A; Rodella C; Indovina L; Bracco C; Brambilla M; Zoccarato O
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 24(3):1036-1045. PubMed ID: 26758376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compressed sensing for reduction of noise and artefacts in direct PET image reconstruction.
    Richter D; Basse-Lüsebrink TC; Kampf T; Fischer A; Israel I; Schneider M; Jakob PM; Samnick S
    Z Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 24(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 23756331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical considerations for image-based PSF and blobs reconstruction in PET.
    Stute S; Comtat C
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(11):3849-70. PubMed ID: 23681172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of (18)F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT using point spread function reconstruction for nodal staging of colorectal cancer.
    Kawashima K; Kato K; Tomabechi M; Matsuo M; Otsuka K; Ishida K; Nakamura R; Ehara S
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150938. PubMed ID: 27146065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of PET reconstruction parameters on the TrueX algorithm. A combined phantom and patient study.
    Knäusl B; Rausch IF; Bergmann H; Dudczak R; Hirtl A; Georg D
    Nuklearmedizin; 2013; 52(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 23348719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative role of motion and PSF compensation in whole-body oncologic PET-MR imaging.
    Petibon Y; Huang C; Ouyang J; Reese TG; Li Q; Syrkina A; Chen YL; El Fakhri G
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042503. PubMed ID: 24694156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of iterative reconstruction protocol, signal-to-background ratio and background activity on measurement of PET spatial resolution.
    Rezaei S; Ghafarian P; Bakhshayesh-Karam M; Uribe CF; Rahmim A; Sarkar S; Ay MR
    Jpn J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 31894449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.