115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20384881)
1. Is it possible to characterize objectively sensitive skin?
Diogo L; Papoila AL
Skin Res Technol; 2010 Feb; 16(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 20384881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cumulative skin irritation test of sanitary pads in sensitive skin and normal skin population.
Farage MA; Maibach H
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17464747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the course of the irritant reaction after irritation with sodium lauryl sulphate.
Gloor M; Senger B; Langenauer M; Fluhr JW
Skin Res Technol; 2004 Aug; 10(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 15225263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interlaboratory studies with a proposed patch test design to evaluate the irritation potential of surfactants.
Mehling A; Chkarnat C; Degwert J; Ennen J; Fink E; Matthies W; Roethlisberger R; Rossow U; Schnitker J; Tronnier H; Wigger-Alberti W; Wilhelm KP
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Mar; 62(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 20565502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variation in barrier impairment and inflammation of human skin as determined by sodium lauryl sulphate penetration rate.
de Jongh CM; Jakasa I; Verberk MM; Kezic S
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):651-7. PubMed ID: 16536807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. A study of patients with hand eczema, atopic dermatitis and controls.
Agner T
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 173():1-26. PubMed ID: 1636360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 15059175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fruit acids and sodium hydroxide in the food industry and their combined effect with sodium lauryl sulphate: controlled in vivo tandem irritation study.
Fluhr JW; Bankova L; Fuchs S; Kelterer D; Schliemann-Willers S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 151(5):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15541082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential irritant skin responses to topical retinoic acid and sodium lauryl sulphate: alone and in crossover design.
Effendy I; Weltfriend S; Patil S; Maibach HI
Br J Dermatol; 1996 Mar; 134(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 8731664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of lotion formulations on irritation using the modified forearm-controlled application test method.
Farage MA; Ebrahimpour A; Steimle B; Englehart J; Smith D
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Aug; 13(3):268-79. PubMed ID: 17610648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Irritant contact dermatitis. Part III. Non-invasive methods to assess biophysical properties of the skin].
Chomiczewska D; Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B
Med Pr; 2010; 61(4):457-66. PubMed ID: 20865858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term repetitive sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritation of the skin: an in vivo study.
Branco N; Lee I; Zhai H; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):278-84. PubMed ID: 16283906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional assessment of a washing emulsion for sensitive skin: mild impairment of stratum corneum hydration, pH, barrier function, lipid content, integrity and cohesion in a controlled washing test.
Bornkessel A; Flach M; Arens-Corell M; Elsner P; Fluhr JW
Skin Res Technol; 2005 Feb; 11(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 15691260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrical impedance model for evaluation of skin irritation in rabbits and humans.
Ferreira DM; Silva CS; Souza MN
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Aug; 13(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 17610647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using skin models to assess the effects of a protection cream on skin barrier function.
zur Mühlen A; Klotz A; Weimans S; Veeger M; Thörner B; Diener B; Hermann M
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2004; 17(4):167-75. PubMed ID: 15258447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sodium hypochlorite, bleaching agents, and the stratum corneum.
Goffin V; Piérard GE; Henry F; Letawe C; Maibach HI
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1997 Aug; 37(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 9378085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human scalp irritation compared to that of the arm and back.
Zhai H; Fautz R; Fuchs A; Bhandarkar S; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Oct; 51(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 15500669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
