These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20384918)

  • 1. The effects of different maceration techniques on nuclear DNA amplification using human bone.
    Lee EJ; Luedtke JG; Allison JL; Arber CE; Merriwether DA; Steadman DW
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jul; 55(4):1032-8. PubMed ID: 20384918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of chemical and heat maceration techniques on the recovery of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from bone.
    Steadman DW; DiAntonio LL; Wilson JJ; Sheridan KE; Tammariello SP
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 16423217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of common imaging and hot water maceration on DNA recovery from skeletal remains.
    Frank EM; Mundorff AZ; Davoren JM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():189-195. PubMed ID: 26363441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus and AmpFlSTR COfiler analysis of tissues stored in GenoFix, a new tissue preservation solution for mass disaster DNA identification.
    Frégeau CJ; Vanstone H; Borys S; McLean D; Maroun JA; Birnboin HC; Fourney RM
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Sep; 46(5):1180-90. PubMed ID: 11569563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of skeletal preparation techniques on DNA from human and non-human bone.
    Rennick SL; Fenton TW; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Sep; 50(5):1016-9. PubMed ID: 16225205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DNA typing from skeletal remains: evaluation of multiplex and megaplex STR systems on DNA isolated from bone and teeth samples.
    Alonso A; Andelinović S; Martín P; Sutlović D; Erceg I; Huffine E; de Simón LF; Albarrán C; Definis-Gojanović M; Fernández-Rodriguez A; García P; Drmić I; Rezić B; Kuret S; Sancho M; Primorac D
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 11387635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of processing techniques on the forensic DNA analysis of human skeletal remains.
    Arismendi JL; Baker LE; Matteson KJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Sep; 49(5):930-4. PubMed ID: 15461092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. TWGDAM validation of AmpFlSTR PCR amplification kits for forensic DNA casework.
    Holt CL; Buoncristiani M; Wallin JM; Nguyen T; Lazaruk KD; Walsh PS
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jan; 47(1):66-96. PubMed ID: 12064672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples.
    Moretti TR; Baumstark AL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Smerick JB; Budowle B
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):647-60. PubMed ID: 11373004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [DNA extraction from old bones].
    Zhang J; Xue QJ; Tang GF; Peng L
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 22(1):72-3. PubMed ID: 16524194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of human fecal material for autosomal and Y chromosome STRs.
    Roy R
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1035-40. PubMed ID: 14535665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of bleach to eliminate contaminating DNA from the surface of bones and teeth.
    Kemp BM; Smith DG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Nov; 154(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 16182949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Difficulties of sex determination from forensic bone degraded DNA: A comparison of three methods.
    Quincey D; Carle G; Alunni V; Quatrehomme G
    Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 23937932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. STR-typing of human DNA from human fecal matter using the QIAGEN QIAamp stool mini kit.
    Johnson DJ; Martin LR; Roberts KA
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):802-8. PubMed ID: 16078481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Belgian population data for 15 STR loci (AmpFlSTR SGM Plus and AmpFlSTR profiler PCR amplification kit).
    Decorte R; Engelen M; Larno L; Nelissen K; Gilissen A; Cassiman JJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Jan; 139(2-3):211-3. PubMed ID: 15040919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance evaluation of two multiplexes used in fluorescent short tandem repeat DNA analysis.
    Buse EL; Putinier JC; Hong MM; Yap AE; Hartmann JM
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Mar; 48(2):348-57. PubMed ID: 12664993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping of keratinised hair. Part 2. An optimised genomic DNA extraction procedure reveals donor dependence of STR profiles.
    McNevin D; Wilson-Wilde L; Robertson J; Kyd J; Lennard C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Oct; 153(2-3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15998572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A rapid wire-based sampling method for DNA profiling.
    Chen T; Catcheside DE; Stephenson A; Hefford C; Kirkbride KP; Burgoyne LA
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):472-7. PubMed ID: 22211864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skeletal remains presumed submerged in water for three years identified using PCR-STR analysis.
    Crainic K; Paraire F; Leterreux M; Durigon M; de Mazancourt P
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Sep; 47(5):1025-7. PubMed ID: 12353539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The successful DNA typing of samples following a thermal cycler power loss.
    Kokoszka JE; Cline RE; Leisy C; Grossweiler LL; Word CJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Sep; 51(5):1074-9. PubMed ID: 17018084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.