170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20384930)
1. A geometric morphometric approach to sex determination of the human adult os coxa.
Bytheway JA; Ross AH
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jul; 55(4):859-64. PubMed ID: 20384930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sexual dimorphism in America: geometric morphometric analysis of the craniofacial region.
Kimmerle EH; Ross A; Slice D
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 18279240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Geometric morphometric approach to sex estimation of human pelvis.
Gonzalez PN; Bernal V; Perez SI
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):68-74. PubMed ID: 19442464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing landmark redundancy for sex-based shape analysis of the adult human os coxa.
Robertson HI; Pokotylo DL; Weston DA
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Aug; 169(4):689-703. PubMed ID: 31155703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Investigation into the Relationship between Human Cranial and Pelvic Sexual Dimorphism.
Best KC; Garvin HM; Cabo LL
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):990-1000. PubMed ID: 29044526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sexual Dimorphism of the First Rib: A Comparative Approach Using Metric and Geometric Morphometric Analyses.
Lynch JJ; Cross P; Heaton V
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Sep; 62(5):1251-1258. PubMed ID: 28168691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human coxal bone sexual dimorphism and multislice computed tomography: geometric morphometric analysis of 65 adults.
Bilfeld MF; Dedouit F; Rousseau H; Sans N; Braga J; Rougé D; Telmon N
J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):578-88. PubMed ID: 22211944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation and reliability of the sex estimation of the human os coxae using freely available DSP2 software for bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology.
Brůžek J; Santos F; Dutailly B; Murail P; Cunha E
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2017 Oct; 164(2):440-449. PubMed ID: 28714560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Osteometric sex estimation from the os coxa in a Thai population.
Mahakkanukrauh P; Ruengdit S; Tun SM; Case DT; Sinthubua A
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Feb; 271():127.e1-127.e7. PubMed ID: 28062152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shape variability of the adult human acetabulum and acetabular fossa related to sex and age by geometric morphometrics. Implications for adult age estimation.
San-Millán M; Rissech C; Turbón D
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Mar; 272():50-63. PubMed ID: 28113134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Test of the DSP Sexing Method on CT Images from a Modern French Sample.
Mestekova S; Bruzek J; Veleminska J; Chaumoitre K
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1295-9. PubMed ID: 26258990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of racial metric variation in the os coxae on the morphological assessment of sex.
Listi GA
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Sep; 55(5):1157-61. PubMed ID: 20487166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sex determination using the Probabilistic Sex Diagnosis (DSP: Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste) tool in a virtual environment.
Chapman T; Lefevre P; Semal P; Moiseev F; Sholukha V; Louryan S; Rooze M; Van Sint Jan S
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jan; 234():189.e1-8. PubMed ID: 24290894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The sexual dimorphism of the sacro-iliac joint: an investigation using geometric morphometric techniques.
Anastasiou E; Chamberlain AT
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1():S126-34. PubMed ID: 22998360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A geometric-morphometric study of the Cretan humerus for sex identification.
Kranioti EF; Bastir M; Sánchez-Meseguer A; Rosas A
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):111.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19446415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outline analysis of sex and population variation in greater sciatic notch and obturator foramen morphology with implications for sex estimation.
Kilmer K; Garvin H
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Sep; 314():110346. PubMed ID: 32615393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphometric analysis of the humerus in an adult South African cadaveric sample.
Maass P; Friedling LJ
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():451.e1-451.e9. PubMed ID: 29895429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex estimation of the humerus: A geometric morphometric analysis in an adult sample.
López-Lázaro S; Pérez-Fernández A; Alemán I; Viciano J
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Nov; 47():101773. PubMed ID: 32810795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of lumbar vertebrae.
Ostrofsky KR; Churchill SE
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 25382679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discriminant function analysis for sex assessment in pelvic girdle bones: sample from the contemporary Mexican population.
Gómez-Valdés JA; Torres Ramírez G; Báez Molgado S; Herrera Sain-Leu P; Castrejón Caballero JL; Sánchez-Mejorada G
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Mar; 56(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 21265837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
