These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2038612)

  • 1. An evaluation of the Rai and Van Ryzin dose-response model in teratology.
    Carr GJ; Portier CJ
    Risk Anal; 1991 Mar; 11(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 2038612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dose-dependent number of implants and implications in developmental toxicity.
    Dunson DB
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):558-69. PubMed ID: 9629644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of a developmental toxicity dose-response model.
    Faustman EM; Wellington DG; Smith WP; Kimmel CA
    Environ Health Perspect; 1989 Feb; 79():229-41. PubMed ID: 2707204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mathematical modeling of reproductive and developmental toxic effects for quantitative risk assessment.
    Kodell RL; Howe RB; Chen JJ; Gaylor DW
    Risk Anal; 1991 Dec; 11(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 1780500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose-response assessment for developmental toxicity. III. Statistical models.
    Allen BC; Kavlock RJ; Kimmel CA; Faustman EM
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1994 Nov; 23(4):496-509. PubMed ID: 7867901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Joint models for toxicology studies with dose-dependent number of implantations.
    Allen AS; Barnhart HX
    Risk Anal; 2002 Dec; 22(6):1165-73. PubMed ID: 12530786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cluster sampling techniques in quantal response teratology and developmental toxicity studies.
    Bieler GS; Williams RL
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):764-76. PubMed ID: 7662858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A malformation incidence dose-response model incorporating fetal weight and/or litter size as covariates.
    Chen J
    Risk Anal; 1993 Oct; 13(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 8259446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trend tests for proportional responses in developmental toxicity experiments.
    Chinchilli VM; Clark BC
    Environ Health Perspect; 1989 Feb; 79():217-21. PubMed ID: 2707202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of litter effects on dose-response modeling in teratology.
    Kupper LL; Portier C; Hogan MD; Yamamoto E
    Biometrics; 1986 Mar; 42(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 3719065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the use of the quasi-likelihood method in teratological experiments.
    Liang KY; Hanfelt J
    Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):872-80. PubMed ID: 7981409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of litter size and days to lambing in the Ripollesa ewe. I. Comparison of models with linear and threshold approaches.
    Casellas J; Caja G; Ferret A; Piedrafita J
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Mar; 85(3):618-24. PubMed ID: 17040938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A shared response model for clustered binary data in developmental toxicity studies.
    Pang Z; Kuk AY
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1076-84. PubMed ID: 16401281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose-response models to quantal-response developmental toxicology data.
    Carr GJ; Portier CJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):779-91. PubMed ID: 8241373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation bias using the beta-binomial distribution in teratology.
    Williams DA
    Biometrics; 1988 Mar; 44(1):305-9. PubMed ID: 3358995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of a correlated binomial model for the analysis of certain toxicological experiments.
    Kupper LL; Haseman JK
    Biometrics; 1978 Mar; 34(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 564719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic variation in litter size and kit survival of mink (Neovison vison).
    Hansen BK; Su G; Berg P
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Dec; 127(6):442-51. PubMed ID: 21077968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A dose-response model for teratological experiments involving quantal responses.
    Rai K; Van Ryzin J
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 4005367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic analysis of discrete reproductive traits in sheep using linear and nonlinear models: I. Estimation of genetic parameters.
    Matos CA; Thomas DL; Gianola D; Tempelman RJ; Young LD
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Jan; 75(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 9027551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Principles and pitfalls in the analysis of prenatal treatment effects in multiparous species.
    Holson RR; Pearce B
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 1992; 14(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 1635542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.