These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20386172)

  • 1. Reducing socially desirable responses in epidemiologic surveys: an extension of the randomized-response technique.
    Moshagen M; Musch J; Ostapczuk M; Zhao Z
    Epidemiology; 2010 May; 21(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 20386172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A stochastic lie detector.
    Moshagen M; Musch J; Erdfelder E
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):222-31. PubMed ID: 21858604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing response reliability of health interview surveys using reinterviews.
    Fabricant SJ; Harpham T
    Bull World Health Organ; 1993; 71(3-4):341-8. PubMed ID: 8324853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social desirability, social intelligence and self-rated oral health status and behaviours.
    Dumitrescu AL; Kawamura M; Toma C; Lascu V
    Rom J Intern Med; 2007; 45(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 18767416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel assessment of behaviors associated with body dissatisfaction and disordered eating.
    Lavender JM; Anderson DA
    Body Image; 2008 Dec; 5(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 18644752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of results from an alcohol survey of a prerecruited Internet panel and the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.
    Heeren T; Edwards EM; Dennis JM; Rodkin S; Hingson RW; Rosenbloom DL
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2008 Feb; 32(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 18162076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of elaboration on socially desirable responding and the validity of biodata measures.
    Schmitt N; Oswald FL; Kim BH; Gillespie MA; Ramsay LJ; Yoo TY
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Dec; 88(6):979-88. PubMed ID: 14640810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does survey non-response bias the association between occupational social class and health?
    Martikainen P; Laaksonen M; Piha K; Lallukka T
    Scand J Public Health; 2007; 35(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 17454926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dietary assessment instruments are susceptible to intervention-associated response set bias.
    Kristal AR; Andrilla CH; Koepsell TD; Diehr PH; Cheadle A
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1998 Jan; 98(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 9434649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
    Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive aspects of health surveys for public information and policy.
    Fienberg SE; Loftus EF; Tanur JM
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(3):598-614. PubMed ID: 3906433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The exclusion of never-married women from Chinese fertility surveys.
    Li RM; Newcomer SF
    Stud Fam Plann; 1996; 27(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 8829297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The prevalence of academic dishonesty in Texas dental hygiene programs.
    Muhney KA; Gutmann ME; Schneiderman E; DeWald JP; McCann A; Campbell PR
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Nov; 72(11):1247-60. PubMed ID: 18981203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Norwegian population surveys on respiratory health in adults: objectives, design, methods, quality controls and response rates.
    Gulsvik A; Humerfelt S; Bakke PS; Omenaas ER; Lehmann S
    Clin Respir J; 2008 Oct; 2 Suppl 1():10-25. PubMed ID: 20298346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of the sex of interviewers on the quality of data in a Nigerian family planning questionnaire.
    Becker S; Feyisetan K; Makinwa-Adebusoye P
    Stud Fam Plann; 1995; 26(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 7482680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of social desirability on adolescent girls' responses to an eating disorders prevention program.
    Tilgner L; Wertheim EH; Paxton SJ
    Int J Eat Disord; 2004 Mar; 35(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 14994359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using logistic regression to detect item-level non-response bias in surveys.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):234-48. PubMed ID: 12904674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement error in alcohol consumption: the Swiss Health Survey.
    Rehm J; Spuhler T
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1993 Oct; 47 Suppl 2():S25-30. PubMed ID: 8262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of a computer-based questionnaire and personal interviews in determining oral health-related behaviours.
    Chestnutt IG; Morgan MZ; Hoddell C; Playle R
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 32(6):410-7. PubMed ID: 15541156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A compromise between self-enhancement and honesty: Chinese self-evaluations on social desirability scales.
    Cuixia L; Jian X; Zhongfang Y
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Feb; 92(1):291-8. PubMed ID: 12674296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.