These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20389999)

  • 1. Spatially deconvolved optical coherence tomography.
    Woolliams PD; Ferguson RA; Hart C; Grimwood A; Tomlins PH
    Appl Opt; 2010 Apr; 49(11):2014-21. PubMed ID: 20389999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image quality improvement in optical coherence tomography using Lucy-Richardson deconvolution algorithm.
    Hojjatoleslami SA; Avanaki MR; Podoleanu AG
    Appl Opt; 2013 Aug; 52(23):5663-70. PubMed ID: 23938416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signal processing for sidelobe suppression in optical coherence tomography images.
    Wang Y; Liang Y; Xu K
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Mar; 27(3):415-21. PubMed ID: 20208930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional characterization of optical coherence tomography point spread functions with a nanoparticle-embedded phantom.
    Agrawal A; Pfefer TJ; Gilani N; Drezek R
    Opt Lett; 2010 Jul; 35(13):2269-71. PubMed ID: 20596216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visualisation of transient processes in biofilms by optical coherence tomography.
    Haisch C; Niessner R
    Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(11):2467-72. PubMed ID: 17462698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optical coherence tomography by using frequency measurements in wavelength domain.
    Seck HL; Zhang Y; Soh YC
    Opt Express; 2011 Jan; 19(2):1324-34. PubMed ID: 21263673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optical coherence tomography axial resolution improvement by step-frequency encoding.
    Bousi E; Charalambous I; Pitris C
    Opt Express; 2010 May; 18(11):11877-90. PubMed ID: 20589049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Localized measurement of optical attenuation coefficients of atherosclerotic plaque constituents by quantitative optical coherence tomography.
    van der Meer FJ; Faber DJ; Baraznji Sassoon DM; Aalders MC; Pasterkamp G; van Leeuwen TG
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1369-76. PubMed ID: 16229422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrasting properties of gold nanoparticles for optical coherence tomography: phantom, in vivo studies and Monte Carlo simulation.
    Zagaynova EV; Shirmanova MV; Kirillin MY; Khlebtsov BN; Orlova AG; Balalaeva IV; Sirotkina MA; Bugrova ML; Agrba PD; Kamensky VA
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4995-5009. PubMed ID: 18711247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of the scattering anisotropy with optical coherence tomography.
    Kodach VM; Faber DJ; van Marle J; van Leeuwen TG; Kalkman J
    Opt Express; 2011 Mar; 19(7):6131-40. PubMed ID: 21451637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-definition mapping of neural activity using voltage-sensitive dyes.
    Cinelli AR
    Methods; 2000 Aug; 21(4):349-72. PubMed ID: 10964579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of motion tracking in echocardiographic image sequences: influence of system geometry and point-spread function.
    Touil B; Basarab A; Delachartre P; Bernard O; Friboulet D
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Mar; 50(3):373-86. PubMed ID: 19837445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional adaptive optics ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography using a liquid crystal spatial light modulator.
    Fernández EJ; Povazay B; Hermann B; Unterhuber A; Sattmann H; Prieto PM; Leitgeb R; Ahnelt P; Artal P; Drexler W
    Vision Res; 2005 Dec; 45(28):3432-44. PubMed ID: 16249013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity to point-spread function parameters in medical ultrasound image deconvolution.
    Shin HC; Prager R; Ng J; Gomersall H; Kingsbury N; Treece G; Gee A
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Mar; 49(3):344-57. PubMed ID: 19068260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structured three-dimensional optical phantom for optical coherence tomography.
    Curatolo A; Kennedy BF; Sampson DD
    Opt Express; 2011 Sep; 19(20):19480-5. PubMed ID: 21996888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A practical approach to eliminate autocorrelation artefacts for volume-rate spectral domain optical coherence tomography.
    Wang RK; Ma Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(12):3231-9. PubMed ID: 16757873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single camera spectral domain polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography using offset B-scan modulation.
    Fan C; Yao G
    Opt Express; 2010 Mar; 18(7):7281-7. PubMed ID: 20389749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Homotopic, non-local sparse reconstruction of optical coherence tomography imagery.
    Liu C; Wong A; Bizheva K; Fieguth P; Bie H
    Opt Express; 2012 Apr; 20(9):10200-11. PubMed ID: 22535111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-resolution ultrasonic imaging using fast two-dimensional homomorphic filtering.
    Jirík R; Taxt T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1440-8. PubMed ID: 16921896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic recovery of the optic nervehead geometry in optical coherence tomography.
    Boyer KL; Herzog A; Roberts C
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 May; 25(5):553-70. PubMed ID: 16689260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.