These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20390557)

  • 1. Application of electro-active biofilms.
    Erable B; Duţeanu NM; Ghangrekar MM; Dumas C; Scott K
    Biofouling; 2010 Jan; 26(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 20390557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Electricity from microorganisms].
    Debabov VG
    Mikrobiologiia; 2008; 77(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 18522314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The performance of a microbial fuel cell depends strongly on anode geometry: a multidimensional modeling study.
    Merkey BV; Chopp DL
    Bull Math Biol; 2012 Apr; 74(4):834-57. PubMed ID: 22015479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of surface roughness, biofilm coverage and biofilm structure on the electrochemical efficiency of microbial cathodes.
    Pons L; Délia ML; Bergel A
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Feb; 102(3):2678-83. PubMed ID: 21131196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selecting anode-respiring bacteria based on anode potential: phylogenetic, electrochemical, and microscopic characterization.
    Torres CI; Krajmalnik-Brown R; Parameswaran P; Marcus AK; Wanger G; Gorby YA; Rittmann BE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9519-24. PubMed ID: 20000550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of anode bacterial communities and performance in microbial fuel cells with different electron donors.
    Jung S; Regan JM
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Nov; 77(2):393-402. PubMed ID: 17786426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selection of a variant of Geobacter sulfurreducens with enhanced capacity for current production in microbial fuel cells.
    Yi H; Nevin KP; Kim BC; Franks AE; Klimes A; Tender LM; Lovley DR
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2009 Aug; 24(12):3498-503. PubMed ID: 19487117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biofilm and nanowire production leads to increased current in Geobacter sulfurreducens fuel cells.
    Reguera G; Nevin KP; Nicoll JS; Covalla SF; Woodard TL; Lovley DR
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Nov; 72(11):7345-8. PubMed ID: 16936064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microtoming coupled to microarray analysis to evaluate the spatial metabolic status of Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms.
    Franks AE; Nevin KP; Glaven RH; Lovley DR
    ISME J; 2010 Apr; 4(4):509-19. PubMed ID: 20033069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enrichment and analysis of anode-respiring bacteria from diverse anaerobic inocula.
    Miceli JF; Parameswaran P; Kang DW; Krajmalnik-Brown R; Torres CI
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):10349-55. PubMed ID: 22909141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power output and columbic efficiencies from biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens comparable to mixed community microbial fuel cells.
    Nevin KP; Richter H; Covalla SF; Johnson JP; Woodard TL; Orloff AL; Jia H; Zhang M; Lovley DR
    Environ Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 10(10):2505-14. PubMed ID: 18564184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of anode potentials on selection of Geobacter strains in microbial electrolysis cells.
    Commault AS; Lear G; Packer MA; Weld RJ
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Jul; 139():226-34. PubMed ID: 23665518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Study of the mechanism of catalytic activity of G. sulfurreducens biofilm anodes during biofilm growth.
    Strycharz-Glaven SM; Tender LM
    ChemSusChem; 2012 Jun; 5(6):1106-18. PubMed ID: 22581467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The study of electrochemically active microbial biofilms on different carbon-based anode materials in microbial fuel cells.
    Liu Y; Harnisch F; Fricke K; Schröder U; Climent V; Feliu JM
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 May; 25(9):2167-71. PubMed ID: 20189793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Model based evaluation of the effect of pH and electrode geometry on microbial fuel cell performance.
    Picioreanu C; van Loosdrecht MC; Curtis TP; Scott K
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2010 Apr; 78(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 19523880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On electron transport through Geobacter biofilms.
    Bond DR; Strycharz-Glaven SM; Tender LM; Torres CI
    ChemSusChem; 2012 Jun; 5(6):1099-105. PubMed ID: 22615023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time-course correlation of biofilm properties and electrochemical performance in single-chamber microbial fuel cells.
    Ren Z; Ramasamy RP; Cloud-Owen SR; Yan H; Mench MM; Regan JM
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(1):416-21. PubMed ID: 20591659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is resistance futile? Changing external resistance does not improve microbial fuel cell performance.
    Lyon DY; Buret F; Vogel TM; Monier JM
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2010 Apr; 78(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 19783225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. First air-tolerant effective stainless steel microbial anode obtained from a natural marine biofilm.
    Erable B; Bergel A
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jul; 100(13):3302-7. PubMed ID: 19289272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electricity production and microbial biofilm characterization in cellulose-fed microbial fuel cells.
    Ren Z; Steinberg LM; Regan JM
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(3):617-22. PubMed ID: 18725730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.