These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20390667)
1. The effect of message frame in anti-smoking public service announcements on cognitive response and attitude toward smoking. Shen L Health Commun; 2010 Jan; 25(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 20390667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of message framing, involvement, and nicotine dependence on anti-smoking public service announcements. Jung WS; Villegas J Health Mark Q; 2011; 28(3):219-31. PubMed ID: 21815740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of message framing, intention to quit smoking, and nicotine dependence on the persuasiveness of smoking cessation messages. Moorman M; van den Putte B Addict Behav; 2008 Oct; 33(10):1267-75. PubMed ID: 18584971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The unintended target: assessing nonsmokers' reactions to gain- and loss-framed antismoking public service announcements. Wong NC; Harvell LA; Harrison KJ J Health Commun; 2013; 18(12):1402-21. PubMed ID: 24015773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adolescents' responses to anti-tobacco advertising: exploring the role of adolescents' smoking status and advertisement theme. Sutfin EL; Szykman LR; Moore MC J Health Commun; 2008; 13(5):480-500. PubMed ID: 18661389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Self-guide framing and persuasion: responsibly increasing message processing to ideal levels. Evans LM; Petty RE Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Mar; 29(3):313-24. PubMed ID: 15273009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors and the role of attitude toward the message and perceived message quality in gain- and loss-frame antidrug persuasion of adolescents. Cho H; Choi J Health Commun; 2010 Jun; 25(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 20512712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of message framing in anti-binge drinking PSAs: the moderating role of counterfactual thinking. Baek TH; Shen L; Reid LN J Health Commun; 2013; 18(4):442-58. PubMed ID: 23289373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of frame, appeal, and outcome extremity of antismoking messages on cognitive processing. Leshner G; Cheng IH Health Commun; 2009 Apr; 24(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 19415554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The best way to tell you to use a condom: the interplay between message format and individuals' level of need for cognition. Carnaghi A; Cadinu M; Castelli L; Kiesner J; Bragantini C AIDS Care; 2007 Mar; 19(3):432-40. PubMed ID: 17453580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How neuroticism affects responses to anti-smoking messages. Bates CE; Monahan JL; Rhodes N Health Commun; 2012; 27(5):486-97. PubMed ID: 22007935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Emotional expressions in antismoking television advertisements: consequences of anger and sadness framing on pathways to persuasion. Kim SJ; Niederdeppe J J Health Commun; 2014; 19(6):692-709. PubMed ID: 24417482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the TARES as an ethical model for antismoking ads. Lee ST; Cheng IH J Health Commun; 2010 Jan; 15(1):55-75. PubMed ID: 20390977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition. Haddock G; Maio GR; Arnold K; Huskinson T Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 18344496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changing exercise through targeting affective or cognitive attitudes. Conner M; Rhodes RE; Morris B; McEachan R; Lawton R Psychol Health; 2011 Feb; 26(2):133-49. PubMed ID: 21318926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The power of a frame: an analysis of newspaper coverage of tobacco issues--United States, 1985-1996. Menashe CL; Siegel M J Health Commun; 1998; 3(4):307-25. PubMed ID: 10977260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of message framing within the stages of change on smoking cessation intentions and behaviors. Cornacchione J; Smith SW Health Commun; 2012; 27(6):612-22. PubMed ID: 22292861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stimulating dialogue: measuring success of the "Smoke Free Horry" campaign. Anderson C; Holody KJ Int Q Community Health Educ; 2013; 34(4):331-49. PubMed ID: 25228483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effectiveness of empathy- versus fear-arousing antismoking PSAs. Shen L Health Commun; 2011; 26(5):404-15. PubMed ID: 21409669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]