These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20390787)

  • 1. Pursuing the panderer: an analysis of United States v. Williams.
    McGrain PN; Moore JL
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Mar; 19(2):190-203. PubMed ID: 20390787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The social, political, and legal construction of the concept of child pornography.
    Mirkin H
    J Homosex; 2009; 56(2):233-67. PubMed ID: 19197651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Child pornography and the internet.
    Temporini H
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2012 Dec; 35(4):821-35. PubMed ID: 23107565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. After Cruzan. The U. S. Supreme Court's decision settles the case but raises new questions.
    Johnson SH
    Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):38-41, 57. PubMed ID: 10107437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Missouri overrules the United States Supreme Court on capital punishment for minors.
    Herbert PB; Meyers JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 15704630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of pornography during the commission of sexual offenses.
    Langevin R; Curnoe S
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2004 Oct; 48(5):572-86. PubMed ID: 15358932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
    Bryant MD
    Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patterns of federal Internet offenders: a pilot study.
    Burgess AW; Carretta CM; Burgess AG
    J Forensic Nurs; 2012 Sep; 8(3):112-21. PubMed ID: 22925126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Oct; 16(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 3771197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Child pornography, the Internet, and congressional activity.
    Meier E
    Pediatr Nurs; 1999; 25(6):661. PubMed ID: 12024387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trends in youth reports of sexual solicitations, harassment and unwanted exposure to pornography on the Internet.
    Mitchell KJ; Wolak J; Finkelhor D
    J Adolesc Health; 2007 Feb; 40(2):116-26. PubMed ID: 17259051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Children's rights after the supreme court's decision on Parham v. J.L. and J.R.
    Frank CC
    Child Welfare; 1980 Jun; 59(6):375-80. PubMed ID: 7379613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cybersex: regulating sexually explicit expression on the Internet.
    Cate FH
    Behav Sci Law; 1996; 14(2):145-66. PubMed ID: 10160233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A world without Roe: how different would it be?
    Glendon MA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 2745061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Supreme Court's pre-emptive strike against patients' rights to sue their HMOs.
    Kopels S; Manselle T
    Soc Work Health Care; 2006; 43(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 16723332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Demographic and personality characteristics of internet child pornography downloaders in comparison to other offenders.
    Reijnen L; Bulten E; Nijman H
    J Child Sex Abus; 2009 Nov; 18(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 20183421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kansas v. Hendricks.
    Grudzinskas AJ; Henry MG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(4):607-12. PubMed ID: 9460048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Supreme Court's decision to recognize a psychotherapist privilege in Jaffee v. Redmond, 116 S. Ct. 1923 (1996): the meaning of "experience and the role of "reason" under Federal Rule of Evidence 501.
    Amann DM; Imwinkelried EJ
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1997; 65(4):1019-49. PubMed ID: 16086528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indiana v. Davis: revisiting due process rights of permanently incompetent defendants.
    Morris DR; Parker GF
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 19767504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.