These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20391214)
1. Fatalistic responses to different types of genetic risk information: exploring the role of self-malleability. Claassen L; Henneman L; De Vet R; Knol D; Marteau T; Timmermans D Psychol Health; 2010 Feb; 25(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 20391214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Being at risk for cardiovascular disease: perceptions and preventive behavior in people with and without a known genetic predisposition. Claassen L; Henneman L; van der Weijden T; Marteau TM; Timmermans DR Psychol Health Med; 2012; 17(5):511-21. PubMed ID: 22360457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A gift or a yoke? Women's and men's responses to genetic risk information from BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing. d'Agincourt-Canning L Clin Genet; 2006 Dec; 70(6):462-72. PubMed ID: 17100990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Family communication regarding inherited high cholesterol: why and how do patients disclose genetic risk? van den Nieuwenhoff HW; Mesters I; Gielen C; de Vries NK Soc Sci Med; 2007 Sep; 65(5):1025-37. PubMed ID: 17507128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Community attitudes towards mental health interventions for healthy people on the basis of genetic susceptibility. Wilde A; Meiser B; Mitchell PB; Schofield PR Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 43(11):1070-6. PubMed ID: 20001402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recovery as perceived by people with schizophrenia, family members and health professionals: a grounded theory. Noiseux S; Ricard N Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Aug; 45(8):1148-62. PubMed ID: 17888440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why does genetic causal information alter perceived treatment effectiveness? An analogue study. Wright AJ; Sutton SR; Hankins M; Whitwell SC; Macfarlane A; Marteau TM Br J Health Psychol; 2012 May; 17(2):294-313. PubMed ID: 22107338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anticipated uptake of genetic testing for familial melanoma in an Australian sample: An exploratory study. Kasparian NA; Meiser B; Butow PN; Soames Job RF; Mann GJ Psychooncology; 2007 Jan; 16(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 16874747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implications of genetic risk information in families with a high density of bipolar disorder: an exploratory study. Meiser B; Mitchell PB; McGirr H; Van Herten M; Schofield PR Soc Sci Med; 2005 Jan; 60(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 15482871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors associated with perceived risk in automotive employees at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Vernon SW; Myers RE; Tilley BC; Li S Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Jan; 10(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 11205487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and awareness of non-pharmacological approach for risk prevention in young survivors of acute myocardial infarction. The cardiovascular risk prevention project "Help Your Heart Stay Young". Migliaresi P; Celentano A; Palmieri V; Pezzullo S; Martino S; Bonito M; Guillaro B; Brancati C; Di Minno G Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis; 2007 Jul; 17(6):468-72. PubMed ID: 17379491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiovascular secondary prevention: patients' knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and their attitude to reduce the risk burden, and the practice of family doctors. The "Help Your Heart Stay Young" study. Celentano A; Palmieri V; Arezzi E; Sabatella M; Guillaro B; Brancati C; Piccinocchi G; Minichiello S; Russo C; Pezzullo S; Tufano A; Finelli L; Panico S; Di Minno G Ital Heart J; 2004 Oct; 5(10):767-73. PubMed ID: 15626274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Psychosocial consequences of genetic susceptibility on development of disease]. Tobiasz-Adamczyk B Przegl Lek; 2005; 62(12):1521-4. PubMed ID: 16786787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Public stigma in health and non-healthcare students: attributions, emotions and willingness to help with adolescent self-harm. Law GU; Rostill-Brookes H; Goodman D Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Jan; 46(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 18962601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceived genetic knowledge, attitudes towards genetic testing, and the relationship between these among patients with a chronic disease. Morren M; Rijken M; Baanders AN; Bensing J Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Feb; 65(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 16939709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Healthy women with a family history of breast cancer: impact of a tailored genetic counseling intervention on risk perception, knowledge, and menopausal therapy decision making. Matloff ET; Moyer A; Shannon KM; Niendorf KB; Col NF J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2006 Sep; 15(7):843-56. PubMed ID: 16999640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hereditary melanoma and predictive genetic testing: why not? Riedijk SR; de Snoo FA; van Dijk S; Bergman W; van Haeringen A; Silberg S; van Elderen TM; Tibben A Psychooncology; 2005 Sep; 14(9):738-45. PubMed ID: 15744786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of self-efficacy and past behaviour on the physical activity intentions of young people. Hagger MS; Chatzisarantis N; Biddle SJ J Sports Sci; 2001 Sep; 19(9):711-25. PubMed ID: 11522147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]