BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20391851)

  • 1. Skeletal anchorage for vertical control in extraction treatment of dolichofacial patients.
    Chaffee MP; Kim SH; Schudy GF
    J Clin Orthod; 2009 Dec; 43(12):749-62. PubMed ID: 20391851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simultaneous reduction in vertical dimension and gummy smile using miniscrew anchorage.
    Lin JC; Liou EJ; Bowman SJ
    J Clin Orthod; 2010 Mar; 44(3):157-70. PubMed ID: 20575317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of a complex malocclusion in a growing skeletal Class II patient.
    El Refaei AK; Fayed MM; Heider AM; Mostafa YA
    J Clin Orthod; 2014 Mar; 48(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 24762377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The geometry of Class II correction with extractions.
    Bryk C; White LW
    J Clin Orthod; 2001 Sep; 35(9):570-9. PubMed ID: 11665551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected].
    Pinzan-Vercelino CR; Janson G; Pinzan A; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; de Freitas KM
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 19395372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymmetrical mandibular molar protraction with conventional mechanics.
    Cozzani M; Mazzotta L; Rinchuse DJ; Cozzani P
    J Clin Orthod; 2015 May; 49(5):304-11. PubMed ID: 26105177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correction of anterior open bite using maxillary third molar anchorage.
    Uribe F; Posada L; Nanda R
    J Clin Orthod; 2009 Dec; 43(12):773-8. PubMed ID: 20391853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anchorage control in bioprogressive vs straight-wire treatment.
    Urias D; Mustafa FI
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):987-92. PubMed ID: 16448242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the variable anchorage straightwire technique using Ricketts' growth prediction.
    Parikakis KA; Moberg S; Hellsing E
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 18832190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of sagittal and vertical dental changes during first phase of orthodontic treatment with MBT vs ROTH prescription.
    Talapaneni AK; Supraja G; Prasad M; Kommi PB
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 22945707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanics of skeletal anchorage. Part 2: Class II nonextraction treatment.
    De Clerck HJ; Cornelis MA
    J Clin Orthod; 2006 May; 40(5):290-8; quiz 307. PubMed ID: 16804241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
    Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lingual applications of the midpalatal absolute anchorage system.
    Hong RK; Lim SM; Heo JM; Baek SH
    J Clin Orthod; 2012 Jun; 46(6):344-53. PubMed ID: 22785070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Correction of a mandibular alveolar protrusion using maxillary miniscrew anchorage in the treatment of a Class II division 1 malocclusion].
    Haiim F
    Orthod Fr; 2011 Dec; 82(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 22363945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
    Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in Class II division 1 patients.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Nanda R
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 19216590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.