These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20392448)

  • 1. Strain and micromotion in intact and resurfaced composite femurs: experimental and numerical investigations.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM; Browne M
    J Biomech; 2010 Jul; 43(10):1923-30. PubMed ID: 20392448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of the change in stem length on the load transfer and bone remodelling for a cemented resurfaced femur.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2908-14. PubMed ID: 20728891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 8314810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element modeling of resurfacing hip prosthesis: estimation of accuracy through experimental validation.
    Taddei F; Martelli S; Gill HS; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):021002. PubMed ID: 20370239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.
    Engh CA; O'Connor D; Jasty M; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):13-29. PubMed ID: 1446429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010; 13(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 19787497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
    Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis.
    Radcliffe IA; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Aug; 22(7):780-6. PubMed ID: 17544555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subject specific finite element analysis of implant stability for a cementless femoral stem.
    Pettersen SH; Wik TS; Skallerud B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Jul; 24(6):480-7. PubMed ID: 19368993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strain shielding in distal femur after patellofemoral arthroplasty under different activity conditions.
    Meireles S; Completo A; António Simões J; Flores P
    J Biomech; 2010 Feb; 43(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 20004900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental validation of numerically predicted strain and micromotion in intact and implanted composite hemi-pelvises.
    Ghosh R; Gupta S; Dickinson A; Browne M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Feb; 227(2):162-74. PubMed ID: 23513987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental validation of finite element models of intact and implanted composite hemipelvises using digital image correlation.
    Ghosh R; Gupta S; Dickinson A; Browne M
    J Biomech Eng; 2012 Aug; 134(8):081003. PubMed ID: 22938356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems.
    Decking R; Puhl W; Simon U; Claes LE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jun; 21(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 16457913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of interface condition and implant design on bone remodelling and failure risk for the resurfaced femoral head.
    Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Laird L; Nassutt R; Morlock M
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1646-53. PubMed ID: 21511258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation into the affect of cementing techniques on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis.
    Radcliffe IA; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 May; 22(4):422-30. PubMed ID: 17270328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical evaluation of proximal tibia behaviour with the use of femoral stems in revision TKA: an in vitro and finite element analysis.
    Completo A; Rego A; Fonseca F; Ramos A; Relvas C; Simões JA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2010 Feb; 25(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 19944503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.