These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20392727)

  • 1. Does signalling mitigate the cost of agonistic interactions? A test in a cricket that has lost its song.
    Logue DM; Abiola IO; Rains D; Bailey NW; Zuk M; Cade WH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Aug; 277(1693):2571-5. PubMed ID: 20392727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual signal loss: The link between behaviour and rapid evolutionary dynamics in a field cricket.
    Zuk M; Bailey NW; Gray B; Rotenberry JT
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 May; 87(3):623-633. PubMed ID: 29417997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can behaviour impede evolution? Persistence of singing effort after morphological song loss in crickets.
    Rayner JG; Schneider WT; Bailey NW
    Biol Lett; 2020 Jun; 16(6):20190931. PubMed ID: 32544378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct and indirect effects of sexual signal loss on female reproduction in the Pacific field cricket (Teleogryllus oceanicus).
    Heinen-Kay JL; Strub DB; Balenger SL; Zuk M
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Dec; 32(12):1382-1390. PubMed ID: 31495021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets.
    Zuk M; Rotenberry JT; Tinghitella RM
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):521-4. PubMed ID: 17148278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel cricket morph has diverged in song and wing morphology across island populations.
    Gallagher JH; Zonana DM; Broder ED; Syammach AM; Tinghitella RM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Nov; 36(11):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 37885146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vestigial singing behaviour persists after the evolutionary loss of song in crickets.
    Schneider WT; Rutz C; Hedwig B; Bailey NW
    Biol Lett; 2018 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 29445043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual signal loss, pleiotropy, and maintenance of a male reproductive polymorphism in crickets.
    Heinen-Kay JL; Nichols RE; Zuk M
    Evolution; 2020 May; 74(5):1002-1009. PubMed ID: 32187385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual signal loss in field crickets maintained despite strong sexual selection favoring singing males.
    Tanner JC; Swanger E; Zuk M
    Evolution; 2019 Jul; 73(7):1482-1489. PubMed ID: 31243769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calling and courtship behaviors initiated by male-male contact via agonistic encounters in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.
    Ogawa Y; Sakai M
    Zoolog Sci; 2009 Aug; 26(8):517-24. PubMed ID: 19719402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymmetric mating preferences accommodated the rapid evolutionary loss of a sexual signal.
    Tinghitella RM; Zuk M
    Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):2087-98. PubMed ID: 19473387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A silent orchestra: convergent song loss in Hawaiian crickets is repeated, morphologically varied, and widespread.
    Rayner JG; Aldridge S; Montealegre-Z F; Bailey NW
    Ecology; 2019 Aug; 100(8):e02694. PubMed ID: 30945280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic experience shapes female mate choice in field crickets.
    Bailey NW; Zuk M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Nov; 275(1651):2645-50. PubMed ID: 18700205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No Effect of Body Size on the Frequency of Calling and Courtship Song in the Two-Spotted Cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus.
    Miyashita A; Kizaki H; Sekimizu K; Kaito C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146999. PubMed ID: 26785351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Male weaponry in a fighting cricket.
    Judge KA; Bonanno VL
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(12):e3980. PubMed ID: 19107188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Replicated evolutionary divergence in the cuticular hydrocarbon profile of male crickets associated with the loss of song in the Hawaiian archipelago.
    Simmons LW; Thomas ML; Gray B; Zuk M
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Oct; 27(10):2249-57. PubMed ID: 25228329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid evolutionary change in a sexual signal: genetic control of the mutation 'flatwing' that renders male field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) mute.
    Tinghitella RM
    Heredity (Edinb); 2008 Mar; 100(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 18000520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic signalling for mate attraction in crickets: Abdominal ganglia control the timing of the calling song pattern.
    Jacob PF; Hedwig B
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 309():51-66. PubMed ID: 27109338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Purring Crickets: The Evolution of a Novel Sexual Signal.
    Tinghitella RM; Broder ED; Gurule-Small GA; Hallagan CJ; Wilson JD
    Am Nat; 2018 Dec; 192(6):773-782. PubMed ID: 30444653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple differences in calling songs and other traits between solitary and gregarious Mormon crickets from allopatric mtDNA clades.
    Bailey NW; Gwynne DT; Bailey WV; Ritchie MG
    BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 7():5. PubMed ID: 17241474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.