110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20393279)
1. Advanced cytologic approaches for the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary cancer.
Fritcher EG; Halling KC
Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2010 May; 26(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 20393279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multivariable model using advanced cytologic methods for the evaluation of indeterminate pancreatobiliary strictures.
Fritcher EG; Kipp BR; Halling KC; Oberg TN; Bryant SC; Tarrell RF; Gores GJ; Levy MJ; Clayton AC; Sebo TJ; Roberts LR
Gastroenterology; 2009 Jun; 136(7):2180-6. PubMed ID: 19232347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlating routine cytology, quantitative nuclear morphometry by digital image analysis, and genetic alterations by fluorescence in situ hybridization to assess the sensitivity of cytology for detecting pancreatobiliary tract malignancy.
Barr Fritcher EG; Kipp BR; Slezak JM; Moreno-Luna LE; Gores GJ; Levy MJ; Roberts LR; Halling KC; Sebo TJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Aug; 128(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 17638662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advanced cytologic techniques for the detection of malignant pancreatobiliary strictures.
Moreno Luna LE; Kipp B; Halling KC; Sebo TJ; Kremers WK; Roberts LR; Barr Fritcher EG; Levy MJ; Gores GJ
Gastroenterology; 2006 Oct; 131(4):1064-72. PubMed ID: 17030177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preliminary experience comparing routine cytology results with the composite results of digital image analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients undergoing EUS-guided FNA.
Levy MJ; Clain JE; Clayton A; Halling KC; Kipp BR; Rajan E; Roberts LR; Root RM; Sebo TJ; Topazian MD; Wang KK; Wiersema MJ; Gores GJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Sep; 66(3):483-90. PubMed ID: 17725938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Optimized Set of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probes for Detection of Pancreatobiliary Tract Cancer in Cytology Brush Samples.
Barr Fritcher EG; Voss JS; Brankley SM; Campion MB; Jenkins SM; Keeney ME; Henry MR; Kerr SM; Chaiteerakij R; Pestova EV; Clayton AC; Zhang J; Roberts LR; Gores GJ; Halling KC; Kipp BR
Gastroenterology; 2015 Dec; 149(7):1813-1824.e1. PubMed ID: 26327129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study.
Fogel EL; deBellis M; McHenry L; Watkins JL; Chappo J; Cramer H; Schmidt S; Lazzell-Pannell L; Sherman S; Lehman GA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Jan; 63(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 16377319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of malignant cytologic criteria in pancreatobiliary brushings with corresponding positive fluorescence in situ hybridization results.
Barr Fritcher EG; Caudill JL; Blue JE; Djuric K; Feipel L; Maritim BK; Ragheb AA; Halling KC; Henry MR; Clayton AC
Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 136(3):442-9. PubMed ID: 21846921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. FISHing for pancreatobiliary tract malignancy in endoscopic brushings enhances the sensitivity of routine cytology.
Barr Fritcher EG; Kipp BR; Halling KC; Clayton AC
Cytopathology; 2014 Oct; 25(5):288-301. PubMed ID: 25073411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strategies for improving diagnostic accuracy of biliary strictures.
Salomao M; Gonda TA; Margolskee E; Eguia V; Remotti H; Poneros JM; Sethi A; Saqi A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 123(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 25564796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA image cytometry and fluorescence in situ hybridization for noninvasive detection of urothelial tumors in voided urine.
Dalquen P; Kleiber B; Grilli B; Herzog M; Bubendorf L; Oberholzer M
Cancer; 2002 Dec; 96(6):374-9. PubMed ID: 12478686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided brush cytology diagnosis of pancreatobiliary tumors].
Gao L; Man XH; Cai YB; Zheng JM; Zhu MH
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 38(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 19575856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the accuracy of pancreatobiliary tract cytology with fluorescence in situ hybridization: a molecular test with proven clinical success.
Kipp BR; Barr Fritcher EG; Pettengill JE; Halling KC; Clayton AC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Nov; 121(11):610-9. PubMed ID: 23633236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fluorescence in situ hybridization in diagnostic cytology.
Halling KC; Kipp BR
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1137-44. PubMed ID: 17640552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of polyomavirus-infected renal transplant recipients' urine specimens: correlation of routine urine cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and digital image analysis.
Kipp BR; Sebo TJ; Griffin MD; Ihrke JM; Halling KC
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Dec; 124(6):854-61. PubMed ID: 16416734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of KRAS mutation analysis and FISH for detecting pancreatobiliary tract cancer in cytology specimens collected during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Kipp BR; Fritcher EG; Clayton AC; Gores GJ; Roberts LR; Zhang J; Levy MJ; Halling KC
J Mol Diagn; 2010 Nov; 12(6):780-6. PubMed ID: 20864634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Targeted multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis for elucidation of inconclusive pancreatobiliary cytology.
Vlajnic T; Somaini G; Savic S; Barascud A; Grilli B; Herzog M; Obermann EC; Holmes BJ; Ali SZ; Degen L; Bubendorf L
Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Aug; 122(8):627-34. PubMed ID: 24753508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An assessment of chromosomal alterations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridisation in pancreatobiliary tract malignancy.
Pu X; Zheng H; Yang X; Ye Q; Fan Z; Yang J; Fan X; Zhou X; Qiu Y; Huang Q; Wu H; Chen J
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Nov; 20(1):367. PubMed ID: 33148183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The utility of Ki-ras mutation analysis in the cytologic diagnosis of pancreatobiliary neoplasma.
Dillon DA; Johnson CC; Topazian MD; Tallini G; Rimm DL; Costa JC
Cancer J; 2000; 6(5):294-301. PubMed ID: 11079168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
