377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20393388)
1. Analysis of idiopathic scoliosis progression by using numerical simulation.
Drevelle X; Lafon Y; Ebermeyer E; Courtois I; Dubousset J; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):E407-12. PubMed ID: 20393388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gravity-induced torque and intravertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis.
Adam CJ; Askin GN; Pearcy MJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):E30-7. PubMed ID: 18197088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo distribution of spinal intervertebral stiffness based on clinical flexibility tests.
Lafon Y; Lafage V; Steib JP; Dubousset J; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 20081515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of Center of Mass and Gravity-Induced Vertebral Axial Torque on the Scoliotic Spine by Barycentremetry.
Thenard T; Vergari C; Hernandez T; Vialle R; Skalli W
Spine Deform; 2019 Jul; 7(4):525-532. PubMed ID: 31202367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in alignment of the scoliotic spine in response to lateral bending.
Beuerlein MJ; Raso VJ; Hill DL; Moreau MJ; Mahood JK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(7):693-8. PubMed ID: 12671357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of soft tissue properties on spinal flexibility in scoliosis: biomechanical simulation of fulcrum bending.
Little JP; Adam CJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E76-82. PubMed ID: 19139657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of the mechanisms of idiopathic scoliosis progression using finite element simulation.
Drevelle X; Dubousset J; Lafon Y; Ebermeyer E; Skalli W
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 140():85-9. PubMed ID: 18810005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from body scanner image by finite element simulations.
Grünwald ATD; Roy S; Alves-Pinto A; Lampe R
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0243736. PubMed ID: 33566808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contribution of Lateral Decubitus Positioning and Cable Tensioning on Immediate Correction in Anterior Vertebral Body Growth Modulation.
Cobetto N; Aubin CE; Parent S
Spine Deform; 2018; 6(5):507-513. PubMed ID: 30122385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative three dimensional correction during in situ contouring surgery by using a numerical model.
Lafon Y; Steib JP; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):453-9. PubMed ID: 20110840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical Modeling of Spine Flexibility and Its Relationship to Spinal Range of Motion and Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Wren TAL; Ponrartana S; Poorghasamians E; Moreau S; Aggabao PC; Zaslow TL; Edison BR; Gilsanz V
Spine Deform; 2017 Jul; 5(4):225-230. PubMed ID: 28622896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Correlation study between spinal curvatures and vertebral and disk deformities in idiopathic scoliosis].
Villemure I; Aubin CE; Dansereau J; Petit Y; Labelle H
Ann Chir; 1999; 53(8):798-807. PubMed ID: 10584392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new method to include the gravitational forces in a finite element model of the scoliotic spine.
Clin J; Aubin CÉ; Lalonde N; Parent S; Labelle H
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2011 Aug; 49(8):967-77. PubMed ID: 21728065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical simulation and analysis of scoliosis correction using a fusionless intravertebral epiphyseal device.
Clin J; Aubin CÉ; Parent S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Mar; 40(6):369-76. PubMed ID: 25584943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of intervertebral disc volume properties below spine fusion, using magnetic resonance imaging, in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.
Violas P; Estivalezes E; Briot J; Sales de Gauzy J; Swider P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):E405-12. PubMed ID: 17621196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional characterization of torsion and asymmetry of the intervertebral discs versus vertebral bodies in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Schlösser TP; van Stralen M; Brink RC; Chu WC; Lam TP; Vincken KL; Castelein RM; Cheng JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):E1159-66. PubMed ID: 24921851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A biomechanical study of the Charleston brace for the treatment of scoliosis.
Clin J; Aubin CE; Parent S; Labelle H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E940-7. PubMed ID: 20431434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sequential Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals Individual Level Deformities of Vertebrae and Discs in the Growing Scoliotic Spine.
Keenan BE; Izatt MT; Askin GN; Labrom RD; Bennett DD; Pearcy MJ; Adam CJ
Spine Deform; 2017 May; 5(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 28449963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intervertebral disc changes with angulation, compression and reduced mobility simulating altered mechanical environment in scoliosis.
Stokes IA; McBride C; Aronsson DD; Roughley PJ
Eur Spine J; 2011 Oct; 20(10):1735-44. PubMed ID: 21706360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical modeling of the lateral decubitus posture during corrective scoliosis surgery.
Lalonde NM; Villemure I; Pannetier R; Parent S; Aubin CE
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jul; 25(6):510-6. PubMed ID: 20413197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
