214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20393395)
1. A decision tree can increase accuracy when assessing curve types according to Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Phan P; Mezghani N; Nault ML; Aubin CE; Parent S; de Guise J; Labelle H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):1054-9. PubMed ID: 20393395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the identification of the Lenke classification lumbar modifier in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Duong L; Cheriet F; Labelle H; Cheung KM; Abel MF; Newton PO; McCall RE; Lenke LG; Stokes IA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Aug; 22(6):448-55. PubMed ID: 19652574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional subclassification of Lenke type 1 scoliotic curves.
Duong L; Mac-Thiong JM; Cheriet F; Labelle H
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 19342936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of reliability between the PUMC and Lenke classification systems for classifying adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Qiu G; Li Q; Wang Y; Yu B; Qian J; Yu K; Lee CI; Zhang J; Shen J; Zhao Y; Weng X; Wang T; Aladin DM; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):E836-42. PubMed ID: 18923307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.
Richards BS; Sucato DJ; Konigsberg DE; Ouellet JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial neural networks assessing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison with Lenke classification.
Phan P; Mezghani N; Wai EK; de Guise J; Labelle H
Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1527-33. PubMed ID: 24095098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative analysis of the inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility between Lenke and PUMC classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis].
Qiu GX; Li QY; Wang YP; Zhang JG; Yu B; Wang T; Yu KY; Qian J; Zhao Y; Li JY; Shen JX; Weng XS; Yang XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 87(33):2332-5. PubMed ID: 18036296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Lenke's new scoliosis classification system.
Ogon M; Giesinger K; Behensky H; Wimmer C; Nogler M; Bach CM; Krismer M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(8):858-62. PubMed ID: 11935109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the lumbar modifier useful in surgical decision making?: defining two distinct Lenke 1A curve patterns.
Miyanji F; Pawelek JB; Van Valin SE; Upasani VV; Newton PO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2545-51. PubMed ID: 18923336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Did the Lenke classification change scoliosis treatment?
Clements DH; Marks M; Newton PO; Betz RR; Lenke L; Shufflebarger H;
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(14):1142-5. PubMed ID: 21358471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of Lenke and King classifications for idiopathic scoliosis and the influence of level of professional training.
Niemeyer T; Wolf A; Kluba S; Halm HF; Dietz K; Kluba T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(18):2103-7; discussion 2108. PubMed ID: 16915096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the King, Lenke, and PUMC classification systems for idiopathic scoliosis].
Sheng WB; Zheng XF; Guo HL; Zhan YL; Mai ED; Jin GL; Pu LT; Sheng J; Deng Q
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 89(15):1047-52. PubMed ID: 19595255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computerized Lenke classification of scoliotic spine.
Zhang J; Shi X; Lv L; Wang X; Zhang Y; Guo F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():945-8. PubMed ID: 24109845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis: an assessment of the Lenke classification.
Puno RM; An KC; Puno RL; Jacob A; Chung SS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Sep; 28(18):2102-14; discussion 2114-5. PubMed ID: 14501921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the lenke and king classification systems in the surgical treatment of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis.
Ward WT; Rihn JA; Solic J; Lee JY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 18165749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional classification of the Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using coronal and lateral spinal radiographs.
Pasha S; Ho-Fung V; Eker M; Nossov S; Francavilla M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Dec; 21(1):824. PubMed ID: 33292188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rule-based algorithm for automated King-type classification of idiopathic scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():149-52. PubMed ID: 15456021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multisurgeon assessment of coronal pattern classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: reliability and error analysis.
Behensky H; Giesinger K; Ogon M; Krismer M; Hannes B; Karlmeinrad G; Michael O; Martin K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(7):762-7. PubMed ID: 11923671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The reliability of preoperative supine radiographs to predict the amount of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Cheh G; Lenke LG; Lehman RA; Kim YJ; Nunley R; Bridwell KH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(24):2668-72. PubMed ID: 18007242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
