206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20393863)
81. Digital subtraction radiography of panoramic radiographs to evaluate maxillary central incisor root resorption after orthodontic treatment.
Ioannidou-Marathiotou I; Papadopoulos MA; Kondylidou-Sidira A; Kokkas A; Karagiannis V
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 20552101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.
Ammar HH; Ngan P; Crout RJ; Mucino VH; Mukdadi OM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e59-71. PubMed ID: 21195258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Cone beam computed tomography in evaluations of some side effects of orthodontic treatment.
Lund H
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (219):4-78. PubMed ID: 22338281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Effect of bracket slot and archwire dimensions on anterior tooth movement during space closure in sliding mechanics: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
Tominaga JY; Ozaki H; Chiang PC; Sumi M; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Bourauel C; Yoshida N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 25085299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Apical root resorption of upper incisors during the torquing stage of the tip-edge technique.
van Loenen M; Dermaut LR; Degrieck J; De Pauw GA
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 17878185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Radiographic predictors for maxillary canine impaction.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 25726402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Assessment of the relationship between tooth inclination and gingival and alveolar bone dimensions using computed tomography of the maxillary anterior teeth: a cross-sectional study.
Montanha-Andrade K; Crusoé-Rebello IM; Barreto M; Neves FS; Santos JND; Cury PR
Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(4):e222136. PubMed ID: 36169497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Three-dimensional monitoring of root movement during orthodontic treatment.
Lee RJ; Weissheimer A; Pham J; Go L; de Menezes LM; Redmond WR; Loos JF; Sameshima GT; Tong H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 25533080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Topographic analysis of maxillary premolars and molars and maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography.
Yoshimine S; Nishihara K; Nozoe E; Yoshimine M; Nakamura N
Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):528-35. PubMed ID: 23114831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. [Cone-beam CT analysis on the treatment efficacy in the vertically impacted maxillary central incisors].
Wang XC; Wang L; Gu Y; Wang YH; Zhao CY
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 54(11):739-744. PubMed ID: 31683380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
91. Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients.
Kim TS; Obst C; Zehaczek S; Geenen C
J Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 79(7):1141-9. PubMed ID: 18597595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Three-dimensional imaging cone bean computer tomography technology: an update and case report of an impacted incisor in a mixed dentition patient.
Nurko C
Pediatr Dent; 2010; 32(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 20836957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Mechanical responses to orthodontic loading: a 3-dimensional finite element multi-tooth model.
Field C; Ichim I; Swain MV; Chan E; Darendeliler MA; Li W; Li Q
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 19201323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Anterior tooth morphology and its effect on torque.
van Loenen M; Degrieck J; De Pauw G; Dermaut L
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 15947225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. [Morphological analysis of roots and alveolar bone changes after upper anterior retraction with maximum anchorage based on cone-beam computed tomography].
Wen FJ; Chen G; Liu Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Aug; 48(4):702-708. PubMed ID: 29263517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Cone Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of the Buccal Bone Thickness in Anterior Maxillary Teeth: Relevance to Immediate Implant Placement.
Gakonyo J; Mohamedali AJ; Mungure EK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):880-887. PubMed ID: 30025005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models.
Cattaneo PM; Treccani M; Carlsson K; Thorgeirsson T; Myrda A; Cevidanes LH; Melsen B
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 22008302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of root length and marginal bone level during orthodontic treatment.
Lund H; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):466-73. PubMed ID: 20050738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Alveolar bone loss around incisors in Class I bidentoalveolar protrusion patients: a retrospective three-dimensional cone beam CT study.
Nahm KY; Kang JH; Moon SC; Choi YS; Kook YA; Kim SH; Huang J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):481-8. PubMed ID: 22184474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
