240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20394791)
1. Use of read-across and tiered exposure assessment in risk assessment under REACH--a case study on a phase-in substance.
Vink SR; Mikkers J; Bouwman T; Marquart H; Kroese ED
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Oct; 58(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 20394791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. First tier modeling of consumer dermal exposure to substances in consumer articles under REACH: a quantitative evaluation of the ECETOC TRA for consumers tool.
Delmaar JE; Bokkers BG; ter Burg W; van Engelen JG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Feb; 65(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 23159863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cross-validation and refinement of the Stoffenmanager as a first tier exposure assessment tool for REACH.
Schinkel J; Fransman W; Heussen H; Kromhout H; Marquart H; Tielemans E
Occup Environ Med; 2010 Feb; 67(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 19773280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toxicological comments to the discussion about REACH.
Greim H; Arand M; Autrup H; Bolt HM; Bridges J; Dybing E; Glomot R; Foa V; Schulte-Hermann R
Arch Toxicol; 2006 Mar; 80(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 16411136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. REACH, non-testing approaches and the urgent need for a change in mind set.
Schaafsma G; Kroese ED; Tielemans EL; Van de Sandt JJ; Van Leeuwen CJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 19061930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The challenge of using read-across within the EU REACH regulatory framework; how much uncertainty is too much? Dipropylene glycol methyl ether acetate, an exemplary case study.
Ball N; Bartels M; Budinsky R; Klapacz J; Hays S; Kirman C; Patlewicz G
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Mar; 68(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 24378700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomonitoring as a tool in the human health risk characterization of dermal exposure.
Boogaard PJ
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 27(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 18684800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stoffenmanager exposure model: development of a quantitative algorithm.
Tielemans E; Noy D; Schinkel J; Heussen H; Van Der Schaaf D; West J; Fransman W
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):443-54. PubMed ID: 18621742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New developments in exposure assessment: the impact on the practice of health risk assessment and epidemiological studies.
Nieuwenhuijsen M; Paustenbach D; Duarte-Davidson R
Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):996-1009. PubMed ID: 16875734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity analysis, dominant factors, and robustness of the ECETOC TRA v3, Stoffenmanager 4.5, and ART 1.5 occupational exposure models.
Riedmann RA; Gasic B; Vernez D
Risk Anal; 2015 Feb; 35(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 25616198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling exposure to persistent chemicals in hazard and risk assessment.
Cowan-Ellsberry CE; McLachlan MS; Arnot JA; Macleod M; McKone TE; Wania F
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):662-79. PubMed ID: 19552503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exposure scenarios for workers.
Marquart H; Northage C; Money C
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 17 Suppl 1():S16-25. PubMed ID: 17851448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exposure-driven risk assessment: applying exposure-based waiving of toxicity tests under REACH.
Rowbotham AL; Gibson RM
Food Chem Toxicol; 2011 Aug; 49(8):1661-73. PubMed ID: 21458516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy Evaluation of Three Modelling Tools for Occupational Exposure Assessment.
Spinazzè A; Lunghini F; Campagnolo D; Rovelli S; Locatelli M; Cattaneo A; Cavallo DM
Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Apr; 61(3):284-298. PubMed ID: 28355416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ECETOC TRA version 3: capturing and consolidating the experiences of REACH.
Money C; Schnoeder F; Noij D; Chang HY; Urbanus J
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 May; 16(5):970-7. PubMed ID: 24638261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrating process safety with molecular modeling-based risk assessment of chemicals within the REACH regulatory framework: benefits and future challenges.
Lewis A; Kazantzis N; Fishtik I; Wilcox J
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Apr; 142(3):592-602. PubMed ID: 16930827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of COSHH Essentials for vapor degreasing and bag filling operations.
Jones RM; Nicas M
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Mar; 50(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 16172141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consumer exposure modelling under REACH: Assessing the defaults.
Oltmanns J; Neisel F; Heinemeyer G; Kaiser E; Schneider K
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Jul; 72(2):222-30. PubMed ID: 25908511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human health screening level risk assessments of tertiary-butyl acetate (TBAC): calculated acute and chronic reference concentration (RfC) and Hazard Quotient (HQ) values based on toxicity and exposure scenario evaluations.
Bus JS; Banton MI; Faber WD; Kirman CR; McGregor DB; Pourreau DB
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2015 Feb; 45(2):142-71. PubMed ID: 25629921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
