These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20394921)

  • 1. Classification of subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
    Loizou CL; McNamara I; Ahmed K; Pryor GA; Parker MJ
    Injury; 2010 Jul; 41(7):739-45. PubMed ID: 20394921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
    İmerci A; Aydogan NH; Tosun K
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 29110093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is there any purpose in classifying subtrochanteric fractures? The reproducibility of four classification systems.
    Guyver PM; McCarthy MJ; Jain NP; Poulter RJ; McAllen CJ; Keenan J
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 May; 24(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 23412146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems.
    Pervez H; Parker MJ; Pryor GA; Lutchman L; Chirodian N
    Injury; 2002 Oct; 33(8):713-5. PubMed ID: 12213423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries classification systems exhibit lower inter- and intra-observer agreement than other fractures classifications?: A comparison using fractures of the trochanteric area of the proximal femur as contrast model.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Klaber I; Carmona M; Palma J; Campos M; Yurac R
    Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):859-64. PubMed ID: 26653269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of the classification of proximal femur fractures: Does clinical experience matter?
    Crijns TJ; Janssen SJ; Davis JT; Ring D; Sanchez HB;
    Injury; 2018 Apr; 49(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 29549969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification.
    van Embden D; Rhemrev SJ; Meylaerts SA; Roukema GR
    Injury; 2010 Apr; 41(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 19906370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classification of hip fractures.
    De Boeck H
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1994; 60 Suppl 1():106-9. PubMed ID: 8053334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inter and intra-observer agreement evaluation of the AO and the Tronzo classification systems of fractures of the trochanteric area.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Besa P; Zamora M; Schweitzer D; Klaber I
    Injury; 2015; 46(6):1054-8. PubMed ID: 25818057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evans' classification of trochanteric fractures: an assessment of the interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
    Andersen E; Jørgensen LG; Hededam LT
    Injury; 1990 Nov; 21(6):377-8. PubMed ID: 2276801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does a traction-internal rotation radiograph help to better evaluate fractures of the proximal femur?
    Koval KJ; Oh CK; Egol KA
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 18537778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures.
    Schipper IB; Steyerberg EW; Castelein RM; van Vugt AB
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Feb; 72(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 11327411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of subtrochanteric fracture criteria on hip fracture classification.
    Huang SY; Grimsrud CD; Provus J; Hararah M; Chandra M; Ettinger B; Lo JC
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Feb; 23(2):743-50. PubMed ID: 21562878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in experienced orthopaedic surgeons.
    Jin WJ; Dai LY; Cui YM; Zhou Q; Jiang LS; Lu H
    Injury; 2005 Jul; 36(7):858-61. PubMed ID: 15949488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reliability of a Garden, AO and simple II stage classifications for intracapsular hip fractures.
    Masionis P; Uvarovas V; Mazarevičius G; Popov K; Venckus Š; Baužys K; Porvaneckas N
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 105(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 30639032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Internal Rotation Traction Radiograph Improves Proximal Femoral Fracture Classification Accuracy and Agreement.
    Khurana B; Mandell JC; Rocha TC; Duran-Mendicuti MA; Jimale H; Rosner B; Harris MB; Sodickson AD; Weaver MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):409-415. PubMed ID: 29894220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multidetector CT: are standard Judet radiographs necessary?
    Ohashi K; El-Khoury GY; Abu-Zahra KW; Berbaum KS
    Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 17005769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Seinsheimer's classification of subtrochanteric fractures. Poor reproducibility of 4 observers' evaluation of 50 cases.
    Gehrchen PM; Nielsen JO; Olesen B; Andresen BK
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1997 Dec; 68(6):524-6. PubMed ID: 9462349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subtrochanteric-intertrochanteric femoral fractures.
    Trafton PG
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1987 Jan; 18(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 3540775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Atypical Fractures are Mainly Subtrochanteric in Singapore and Diaphyseal in Sweden: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Schilcher J; Howe TS; Png MA; Aspenberg P; Koh JS
    J Bone Miner Res; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2127-32. PubMed ID: 25950861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.