136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20394972)
1. Histologic differences between extrinsic and intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Yiee JH; Johnson-Welch S; Baker LA; Wilcox DT
Urology; 2010 Jul; 76(1):181-4. PubMed ID: 20394972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathologic findings in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction and crossing vessels.
Richstone L; Seideman CA; Reggio E; Bluebond-Langner R; Pinto PA; Trock B; Kavoussi LR
Urology; 2009 Apr; 73(4):716-9; discussion 719. PubMed ID: 19193425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structural changes of collagen components and diminution of nerves in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Murakumo M; Nonomura K; Yamashita T; Ushiki T; Abe K; Koyanagi T
J Urol; 1997 May; 157(5):1963-8. PubMed ID: 9112572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extracellular matrix degradation and reduced neural density in children with intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Kaya C; Bogaert G; de Ridder D; Schwentner C; Fritsch H; Oswald J; Radmayr C
Urology; 2010 Jul; 76(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 20303154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children by polar vessels: histological examination result.
Piro E; Colombini F; Brugnoni M; Perilli D; Abati LC; Zocca V; Vallieri L; D'Alessio A
Pediatr Med Chir; 2023 May; 45(1):. PubMed ID: 37254943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences between intrinsic and extrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction related to crossing vessels: histology and functional analyses.
Ellerkamp V; Kurth RR; Schmid E; Zundel S; Warmann SW; Fuchs J
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 26219514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structural changes of smooth muscle in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Hosgor M; Karaca I; Ulukus C; Ozer E; Ozkara E; Sam B; Ucan B; Kurtulus S; Karkiner A; Temir G
J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Oct; 40(10):1632-6. PubMed ID: 16226997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional assessment of crossing vessels as etiology of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Stern JM; Park S; Anderson JK; Landman J; Pearle M; Cadeddu JA
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1022-4. PubMed ID: 17572178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Renal pelvis cuff pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction for the high inserting ureter: an initial experience.
Palmer LS; Proano JM; Palmer JS
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):1088-90. PubMed ID: 16094065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction from a crossing renal vessel: demography and imaging.
Rooks VJ; Lebowitz RL
Pediatr Radiol; 2001 Feb; 31(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 11214681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Desai MM; Desai MR; Gill IS
Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoperative inspection of the ureteropelvic junction during pyeloplasty is not sufficient to distinguish between extrinsic and intrinsic causes of obstruction: Correlation with histological analysis.
Mut T; Acar Ö; Oktar T; Kılıçaslan I; Esen T; Ander H; Ziylan O
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):223.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27050811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Smooth muscle cell apoptosis and defective neural development in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Kajbafzadeh AM; Payabvash S; Salmasi AH; Monajemzadeh M; Tavangar SM
J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):718-23; discussion 723. PubMed ID: 16813927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic renal scintigraphy in children with vesicoureteral reflux and suspected coexisting ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Stauss J; Connolly LP; Connolly SA; Zurakowski D; Treves ST; Peters CA
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1966-70. PubMed ID: 14532835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting the clinical outcome of congenital unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction in newborn by urinary proteome analysis.
Decramer S; Wittke S; Mischak H; Zürbig P; Walden M; Bouissou F; Bascands JL; Schanstra JP
Nat Med; 2006 Apr; 12(4):398-400. PubMed ID: 16550189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Altered expression of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Solari V; Piotrowska AP; Puri P
J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 1):2420-2. PubMed ID: 14634443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children with renal ectopy.
Kramer SA; Kelalis PP
J Urol (Paris); 1984; 90(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 6501910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association between intraoperative anatomical variation and histopathological parameters in cases of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: A cross-sectional study.
Solanki S; Menon P; Reddy M; Parkhi M; Gupta K; Gupta PK; Peters NJ; Samujh R
Afr J Paediatr Surg; 2023; 20(3):206-210. PubMed ID: 37470557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
