BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20395082)

  • 21. Sex determination using metacarpal biometric data from the Athens Collection.
    Manolis SK; Eliopoulos C; Koilias CG; Fox SC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Dec; 193(1-3):130.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19850424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determination of sex from an autopsy sample of adult hyoid bones.
    Mukhopadhyay PP
    Med Sci Law; 2012 Jul; 52(3):152-5. PubMed ID: 22427484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A method for estimating sex using the clavicle, humerus, radius, and ulna.
    Albanese J
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1413-9. PubMed ID: 23865634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sexual dimorphism of human sternum in a contemporary Spanish population.
    García-Parra P; Pérez Fernández Á; Djorojevic M; Botella M; Alemán I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Nov; 244():313.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25102779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Geometric morphometric approach to sex estimation of human pelvis.
    Gonzalez PN; Bernal V; Perez SI
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):68-74. PubMed ID: 19442464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A method for estimating sex using metric analysis of the scapula.
    Dabbs GR; Moore-Jansen PH
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 20002272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sex determination from the radius and ulna in a modern South African sample.
    Barrier IL; L'Abbé EN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):85.e1-7. PubMed ID: 18511225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sex estimation using dimensions around the nutrient foramen of the long bones of the arm and forearm in South Africans.
    Mokoena P; Billings BK; Bidmos MA; Mazengenya P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():404.e1-404.e5. PubMed ID: 28807464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A metric method for sex determination using the proximal femur and fragmentary hipbone.
    Albanese J; Eklics G; Tuck A
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Nov; 53(6):1283-8. PubMed ID: 18717754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An assessment of the accuracy of discriminant function equations for sex determination of the femur and tibia from a South African population.
    Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Mar; 206(1-3):212.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21251773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sexual dimorphism of anterior sacral curvature.
    Plochocki JH
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):161-4. PubMed ID: 20487142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sex assessment from the sacral base by means of image processing.
    Benazzi S; Maestri C; Parisini S; Vecchi F; Gruppioni G
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Mar; 54(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 19207288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sexing of human hip bones of Indian origin by discriminant function analysis.
    Dixit SG; Kakar S; Agarwal S; Choudhry R
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2007 Oct; 14(7):429-35. PubMed ID: 17720595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Gender determination based on osteometric characteristics of the upper and lower extremities by discriminant analysis].
    Zviagin VN; Sineva IM
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2007; 50(5):18-21. PubMed ID: 18050686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sternal index: Is it a reliable indicator of sex in the Maharashtrian population of India?
    Hunnargi SA; Menezes RG; Kanchan T; Lobo SW; Uysal S; Herekar NG; Krishan K; Garg RK
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2009 Feb; 16(2):56-8. PubMed ID: 19134997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mandibular ramus: an indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible.
    Saini V; Srivastava R; Rai RK; Shamal SN; Singh TB; Tripathi SK
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S13-6. PubMed ID: 20950321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Foot index: is it a tool for sex determination?
    Moudgil R; Kaur R; Menezes RG; Kanchan T; Garg RK
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2008 May; 15(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 18423354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A study of sexual variation in Indian femur.
    Purkait R; Chandra H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Nov; 146(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 15485718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Forearm bones and sexual variation in Turkish population.
    Uzün I; Işcan MY; Celbiş O
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2011 Dec; 32(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 21546820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison between neural network and other metric methods to determine sex from the upper femur in a modern French population.
    du Jardin P; Ponsaillé J; Alunni-Perret V; Quatrehomme G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Nov; 192(1-3):127.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19733989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.