These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20395779)

  • 1. Localized trabecular damage adjacent to interbody fusion devices.
    Warden KE; Davy DT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):874-80. PubMed ID: 20395779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae.
    Reinhold M; Schwieger K; Goldhahn J; Linke B; Knop C; Blauth M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16481950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective design delineation and subsequent in vitro evaluation of a new posterior dynamic stabilization system.
    Wilke HJ; Heuer F; Schmidt H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 19179920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element analysis of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cage and pedicle screw fixation.
    Kim Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2558-68. PubMed ID: 17978654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
    Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
    Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro fixator rod loading after transforaminal compared to anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kettler A; Niemeyer T; Issler L; Merk U; Mahalingam M; Werner K; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):435-42. PubMed ID: 16442678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stress analysis of interbody fusion--finite element modelling of intervertebral implant and vertebral body.
    Adam C; Pearcy M; McCombe P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 May; 18(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 12689775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new distractable implant for vertebral body replacement: biomechanical testing of four implants for the thoracolumbar spine.
    Reinhold M; Schmoelz W; Canto F; Krappinger D; Blauth M; Knop C
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Oct; 129(10):1375-82. PubMed ID: 19190924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Load sharing and stabilization effects of anterior cervical devices.
    Cheng BC; Burns P; Pirris S; Welch WC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):571-7. PubMed ID: 19956031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement.
    Auerbach JD; Ballester CM; Hammond F; Carine ET; Balderston RA; Elliott DM
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 20362251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study on the structural properties of the lumbar endplate: histological structure, the effect of bone density, and spinal level.
    Hou Y; Luo Z
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):E427-33. PubMed ID: 19454994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of fusion-bone stiffness on the mechanical behavior of the lumbar spine after vertebral body replacement.
    Rohlmann A; Zander T; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Mar; 21(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 16356613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Macroscopic and histologic analyses of de novo bone in the posterior spine at time of spinal implant removal.
    Birch N; D'Souza WL
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Aug; 22(6):434-8. PubMed ID: 19652571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
    Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The mechanical effect of commercially pure titanium and polyetheretherketone rods on spinal implants at the operative and adjacent levels.
    Turner JL; Paller DJ; Murrell CB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Oct; 35(21):E1076-82. PubMed ID: 20838271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
    Scholz M; Reyes PM; Schleicher P; Sawa AG; Baek S; Kandziora F; Marciano FF; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.