BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20397497)

  • 1. An assessment of shade taking by dental undergraduates.
    McAndrew R; Chan PW; Milward PJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 20397497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the shade matching ability of dental students using two light sources.
    Curd FM; Jasinevicius TR; Graves A; Cox V; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 17174655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry.
    Jarad FD; Russell MD; Moss BW
    Br Dent J; 2005 Jul; 199(1):43-9; discussion 33. PubMed ID: 16003426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus.
    Paravina RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 12475156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods.
    Bahannan SA
    J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24252802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating tooth color matching ability of dental students.
    Jaju RA; Nagai S; Karimbux N; Da Silva JD
    J Dent Educ; 2010 Sep; 74(9):1002-10. PubMed ID: 20837742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shade-matching abilities of dental laboratory technicians using a commercial light source.
    Jasinevicius TR; Curd FM; Schilling L; Sadan A
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jan; 18(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 19166550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability of a dental shade-matching instrument when compared to traditional visual methods of shade evaluation.
    Kanawati A; Richards MW
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 19903610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols.
    Della Bona A; Barrett AA; Rosa V; Pinzetta C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19019420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shade matching performance of dental students with three various lighting conditions.
    Nakhaei M; Ghanbarzadeh J; Keyvanloo S; Alavi S; Jafarzadeh H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 23579903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality?
    Haddad HJ; Jakstat HA; Arnetzl G; Borbely J; Vichi A; Dumfahrt H; Renault P; Corcodel N; Pohlen B; Marada G; de Parga JA; Reshad M; Klinke TU; Hannak WB; Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e40-4. PubMed ID: 19520478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction.
    Da Silva JD; Park SE; Weber HP; Ishikawa-Nagai S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 18456047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metameric effect between natural teeth and the shade tabs of a shade guide.
    Corcodel N; Helling S; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Jun; 118(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 20572867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human-eye versus computerized color matching.
    Yap AU; Sim CP; Loh WL; Teo JH
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):358-63. PubMed ID: 10823085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of visual shade determination and an intra-oral dental colourimeter.
    Yilmaz B; Karaagaclioglu L
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 18466278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means.
    Alsaleh S; Labban M; AlHariri M; Tashkandi E
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e82-7. PubMed ID: 22306532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tooth shade selection using a colorimetric instrument compared with that using a conventional shade guide.
    Kuzmanović D; Lyons KM
    N Z Dent J; 2009 Dec; 105(4):131-4. PubMed ID: 20000193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of colour defective vision on shade matching accuracy.
    Ethell J; Jarad FD; Youngson CC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Sep; 14(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 17024987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch.
    Douglas RD; Steinhauer TJ; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):200-8. PubMed ID: 17499089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.