These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20397497)

  • 21. A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection.
    Judeh A; Al-Wahadni A
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):e69-79. PubMed ID: 19862392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants.
    Gokce HS; Piskin B; Ceyhan D; Gokce SM; Arisan V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Mar; 103(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 20188236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of time consumption and color matching results of different dental occupational groups.
    Ortolan SM; Persic S; Celebic A; Mehulic K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23998147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Shading of ceramic crowns using digital tooth shade matching devices.
    Baltzer A; Kaufmann-Jinoian V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Apr; 8(2):129-52. PubMed ID: 16201397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of shade matching performed by colour blind and normal dental students using 3D Master and Vita Lumin shade guides.
    Vafaee F; Rakhshan V; Vafaei M; Khoshhal M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 22474932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain.
    Barrett AA; Grimaudo NJ; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 12488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas.
    Pecho OE; Ghinea R; Alessandretti R; Pérez MM; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 26631341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of a common shade guide to test the perception of differences in the shades and value by members of the dental team.
    Geary JL; Kinirons MJ
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Jul; 6(3):107-10. PubMed ID: 11819873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of shade matching by visual observation and an intraoral dental colorimeter.
    Li Q; Wang YN
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 34(11):848-54. PubMed ID: 17919252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimization of tooth color and shade guide design.
    Paravina RD; Majkic G; Imai FH; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 17451478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Precision shade technology: contemporary strategies in shade selection.
    Chu SJ
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002; 14(1):79-83; quiz 84. PubMed ID: 11905162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correlations between color differences based on three color-difference formulas using dental shade guide tabs.
    Kim JG; Yu B; Lee YK
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 19054306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differences between the human eye and the spectrophotometer in the shade matching of tooth colour.
    Gómez-Polo C; Gómez-Polo M; Celemin-Viñuela A; Martínez Vázquez De Parga JA
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):742-5. PubMed ID: 24140995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Shade Matching Ability among Dental Students under Different Lighting Conditions: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Jouhar R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36231194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The linear shade guide design of Vita 3D-master performs as well as the original design of the Vita 3D-master.
    Corcodel N; Rammelsberg P; Jakstat H; Moldovan O; Schwarz S; Hassel AJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Nov; 37(11):860-5. PubMed ID: 20633072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison between a new visual method of colour matching by intraoral camera and conventional visual and spectrometric methods.
    Lasserre JF; Pop-Ciutrila IS; Colosi HA
    J Dent; 2011 Dec; 39 Suppl 3():e29-36. PubMed ID: 22101123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Shade selection performed by novice dental professionals and colorimeter.
    Klemetti E; Matela AM; Haag P; Kononen M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 33(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 16409514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides.
    Hammad IA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12589286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of color parameters of composite resin shade guides using digital imaging versus colorimeter.
    Yamanel K; Caglar A; Özcan M; Gulsah K; Bagis B
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Dec; 22(6):379-88. PubMed ID: 21126293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating the ability of dental technician students and graduate dentists to match tooth color.
    Sinmazisik G; Trakyali G; Tarcin B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1559-66. PubMed ID: 25134993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.