These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20397560)

  • 1. An assessment of costs and benefits associated with mercury emission reductions from major anthropogenic sources.
    Pacyna JM; Sundseth K; Pacyna EG; Jozewicz W; Munthe J; Belhaj M; Aström S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Mar; 60(3):302-15. PubMed ID: 20397560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Active methods of mercury removal from flue gases.
    Marczak M; Budzyń S; Szczurowski J; Kogut K; Burmistrz P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(9):8383-8392. PubMed ID: 29572741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Control strategies of atmospheric mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China.
    Tian H; Wang Y; Cheng K; Qu Y; Hao J; Xue Z; Chai F
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 May; 62(5):576-86. PubMed ID: 22696807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Were mercury emission factors for Chinese non-ferrous metal smelters overestimated? Evidence from onsite measurements in six smelters.
    Zhang L; Wang S; Wu Q; Meng Y; Yang H; Wang F; Hao J
    Environ Pollut; 2012 Dec; 171():109-17. PubMed ID: 22892573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Control of mercury emissions from stationary coal combustion sources in China: Current status and recommendations.
    Hu Y; Cheng H
    Environ Pollut; 2016 Nov; 218():1209-1221. PubMed ID: 27596303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of mercury and chlorine content of coal on mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China.
    Zhang L; Wang S; Meng Y; Hao J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jun; 46(11):6385-92. PubMed ID: 22533359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mercury emissions from coal-fired power stations: The current state of the art in the Netherlands.
    Meij R; te Winkel H
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Sep; 368(1):393-6. PubMed ID: 16289297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Synergistic mercury removal by conventional pollutant control strategies for coal-fired power plants in China.
    Wang S; Zhang L; Wu Y; Ancora MP; Zhao Y; Hao J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Jun; 60(6):722-30. PubMed ID: 20564998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The benefits and costs of reducing emissions from the electricity sector.
    Palmer K; Burtraw D; Shih JS
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(1):115-30. PubMed ID: 16716494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mercury speciation and emissions from coal combustion in Guiyang, Southwest China.
    Tang S; Feng X; Qiu J; Yin G; Yang Z
    Environ Res; 2007 Oct; 105(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 17517388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic Management of NOx and SO2 Emissions in the Texas and Mid-Atlantic Electric Power Systems and Implications for Air Quality.
    McDonald-Buller E; Kimura Y; Craig M; McGaughey G; Allen D; Webster M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(3):1611-9. PubMed ID: 26727552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions.
    Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):9838-45. PubMed ID: 22888978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Economic analysis of atmospheric mercury emission control for coal-fired power plants in China.
    Ancora MP; Zhang L; Wang S; Schreifels J; Hao J
    J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Jul; 33():125-34. PubMed ID: 26141885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mercury control costs drop.
    Cooney CM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb; 41(4):1061-2. PubMed ID: 17593698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of Emission Controls to Reduce the Atmospheric Concentrations of Mercury.
    Castro MS; Sherwell J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14000-7. PubMed ID: 26606506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Economics of an integrated approach to control SO2, NOX, HCl, and particulate emissions from power plants.
    Shemwell BE; Ergut A; Levendis YA
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 May; 52(5):521-34. PubMed ID: 12022692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preliminary estimates of performance and cost of mercury control technology applications on electric utility boilers.
    Srivastava RK; Sedman CB; Kilgroe JD; Smith D; Renninger S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Oct; 51(10):1460-70. PubMed ID: 11686251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy?
    Dobesova K; Apt J; Lave LB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):8578-83. PubMed ID: 16323750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefits of current and future policies on emissions of China's coal-fired power sector indicated by continuous emission monitoring.
    Zhang Y; Bo X; Zhao Y; Nielsen CP
    Environ Pollut; 2019 Aug; 251():415-424. PubMed ID: 31103001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DOE/NETL's phase II mercury control technology field testing program: preliminary economic analysis of activated carbon injection.
    Jones AP; Hoffmann JW; Smith DN; Feeley TJ; Murphy JT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb; 41(4):1365-71. PubMed ID: 17593743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.