These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20397591)

  • 1. Effects of suspicion on willingness to engage in systematic processing of persuasive arguments.
    Echebarria-Echabe A
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(2):148-59. PubMed ID: 20397591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Horcajo J; Petty RE; Briñol P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 99(3):498-512. PubMed ID: 20649371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition.
    Haddock G; Maio GR; Arnold K; Huskinson T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 18344496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The perceived informational basis of attitudes: implications for subjective ambivalence.
    Tormala ZL; DeSensi VL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Feb; 34(2):275-87. PubMed ID: 18212335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Persuasive communication about AIDS prevention: need for cognition determines the impact of message format.
    Bakker AB
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1999 Apr; 11(2):150-62. PubMed ID: 10214498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of minority/majority source status on attitude certainty: a matching perspective.
    Tormala ZL; Desensi VL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jan; 35(1):114-25. PubMed ID: 19106081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thinking straight while seeing red: the influence of anger on information processing.
    Moons WG; Mackie DM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 May; 33(5):706-20. PubMed ID: 17440205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-guide framing and persuasion: responsibly increasing message processing to ideal levels.
    Evans LM; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Mar; 29(3):313-24. PubMed ID: 15273009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic and heuristic processing of majority and minority-endorsed messages: the effects of varying outcome relevance and levels of orientation on attitude and message processing.
    Martin R; Hewstone M; Martin PY
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Jan; 33(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 17178929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minority versus majority influence and uncertainty orientation: processing persuasive messages on the basis of situational expectancies.
    Shuper PA; Sorrentino RM
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Apr; 144(2):127-47. PubMed ID: 15074502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The best way to tell you to use a condom: the interplay between message format and individuals' level of need for cognition.
    Carnaghi A; Cadinu M; Castelli L; Kiesner J; Bragantini C
    AIDS Care; 2007 Mar; 19(3):432-40. PubMed ID: 17453580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments.
    Moons WG; Mackie DM; Garcia-Marques T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 19210062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fear appeals motivate acceptance of action recommendations: evidence for a positive bias in the processing of persuasive messages.
    Das EH; de Wit JB; Stroebe W
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 May; 29(5):650-64. PubMed ID: 15272997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of message frame in anti-smoking public service announcements on cognitive response and attitude toward smoking.
    Shen L
    Health Commun; 2010 Jan; 25(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 20390667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resisting persuasion by the skin of one's teeth: the hidden success of resisted persuasive messages.
    Tormala ZL; Clarkson JJ; Petty RE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(3):423-35. PubMed ID: 16938028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mood and multiple source characteristics: mood congruency of source consensus status and source trustworthiness as determinants of message scrutiny.
    Ziegler R; Diehl M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1016-30. PubMed ID: 21632961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discrete emotions and persuasion: the role of emotion-induced expectancies.
    DeSteno D; Petty RE; Rucker DD; Wegener DT; Braverman J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Jan; 86(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 14717627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Think" versus "feel" framing effects in persuasion.
    Mayer ND; Tormala ZL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Apr; 36(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 20363901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Briñol P; Petty RE; Barden J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Nov; 93(5):711-27. PubMed ID: 17983296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of integrating instrumental and affective arguments in rhetorical and testimonial health messages.
    Keer M; van den Putte B; de Wit J; Neijens P
    J Health Commun; 2013; 18(9):1148-61. PubMed ID: 23659225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.