558 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20398449)
1. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.
Singh I; Hemal AK
Can J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(2):5099-108. PubMed ID: 20398449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of the current status.
Shah KK; Louie M; Thaly RK; Patel VR
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Mar; 3():35-40. PubMed ID: 17441024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned.
Kutikov A; Nguyen M; Guzzo T; Canter D; Casale P
J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2237-9; discussion 2239-40. PubMed ID: 17070302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty.
Olweny EO; Park SK; Tan YK; Gurbuz C; Cadeddu JA; Best SL
Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 22036645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair.
Hemal AK; Mishra S; Mukharjee S; Suryavanshi M
Int J Urol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):744-6. PubMed ID: 18786197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic robotic-assisted management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in patients with horseshoe kidneys: technique and 1-year follow-up.
Chammas M; Feuillu B; Coissard A; Hubert J
BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 16469030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey.
Freilich DA; Penna FJ; Nelson CP; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):704-8. PubMed ID: 20022046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population.
Casale P
Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 19057224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option.
Lindgren BW; Hagerty J; Meyer T; Cheng EY
J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):932-7. PubMed ID: 22819409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Technical aspects of laparoscopic robot-assisted pyeloplasty].
Ferhi K; Rouprêt M; Rode J; Misraï V; Lebeau T; Richard F; Vaessen C
Prog Urol; 2009 Oct; 19(9):606-10. PubMed ID: 19800549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.
Patel V
Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15992879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre.
Schwentner C; Pelzer A; Neururer R; Springer B; Horninger W; Bartsch G; Peschel R
BJU Int; 2007 Oct; 100(4):880-5. PubMed ID: 17535275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.
Riachy E; Cost NG; Defoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Noh PH
J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Weise ES; Winfield HN
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Lee RS; Borer JG
Curr Opin Urol; 2006 Jul; 16(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 16770130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of robotics in the management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Atug F; Burgess SV; Castle EP; Thomas R
Int J Clin Pract; 2006 Jan; 60(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 16409421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Editorial comment on: Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.
Novara G
Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):857-8. PubMed ID: 19359085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic pyeloplasty: a critical appraisal.
Badwan K; Bhayani S
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Mar; 3():20-2. PubMed ID: 17441021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
